Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
4. Ray (CTL)
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:47 AM (#2495788)
Apparently, Texas didn't feel secure with the 21-run lead in the top of the 9th, since they tacked on another half dozen insurance runs.
That sent the game to the bottom of the ninth, with the Orioles needing 27 to tie, and 28 to win. Trembley apparently abandoned small ball and let his team swing away.
I don't believe I've ever seen a team (comprised of players above the age of 6) score 30 runs in a game.
5. Guapo
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:47 AM (#2495790)
That loud moaning noise you just heard was Jayson Stark reaching climax.
6. Gonfalon Bubble
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:48 AM (#2495794)
Wasn't the record for runs in a game 29?
7. AndrewJ
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:48 AM (#2495795)
Guapo>> Thanks for a Primey-worthy reply.
8. Guapo
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:49 AM (#2495797)
I note that the yahoo boxscore has Wes Littleton of Texas picking up the save. I'm assuming that's a subtle joke.
EDIT: Apparently the joke's on me and the guy who came up with the save rule! See posts 14, 15, 17, and 19 below.
9. SouthSideRyan
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:50 AM (#2495799)
I don't think I've even seen 30 runs in a softball game. Although I guess slaughter rules affect that somewhat.
10. Tony H.
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:50 AM (#2495800)
The Rangers failed to score in 5 of their 9 innings. They scored all 30 runs in four innings.
Did Littleton earn the easiest save in the history of baseball?
11. Foster
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:50 AM (#2495801)
The record depends on when you start counting. The Red Sox scored 29 a couple times in the 50s; that was considered the modern record.
This from AP:
The Texas Rangers became the first team in 110 years to score 30 runs in a game, setting an American League record Wednesday in a 30-3 rout of the Baltimore Orioles.
It was the ninth time a major league team scored 30 runs, the first since Chicago set the major league record in a 36-7 rout of Louisville in a National League game on June 28, 1897, according to the Elias Sports Bureau.
12. Gonfalon Bubble
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:50 AM (#2495802)
Yup.
The record for most runs scored by a team in a single game is 36, set by the Chicago Colts (now the Chicago Cubs) against the Louisville Colonels (which joined the National League in 1892) on June 29, 1897.
The modern-day record of 29 has been achieved on two occasions: The first was on June 8, 1950, by the Boston Red Sox against the St. Louis Browns (now the Baltimore Orioles). The second was on April 23, 1955, by the Chicago White Sox against the Kansas City Athletics (now the Oakland Athletics).
13. McCoy
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:50 AM (#2495803)
Wasn't the record for runs in a game 29?
36 I believe by the Cubbies (well they weren't called Cubbies then) and the "modern" record is/was 26 set by 5 different franchises. Twice by the Cubs.
14. Tony H.
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:50 AM (#2495804)
I note that the yahoo boxscore has Wes Littleton of Texas picking up the save. I'm assuming that's a subtle joke.
Three inning save. It's real, amazingly.
15. SouthSideRyan
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:50 AM (#2495805)
Isn't 3 innings of relief to close out a game an auto save?
16. AndrewJ
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:51 AM (#2495806)
I presume scoring 30 unanswered runs in a game approaches (if not sets) a MLB (1871-present) record?
17. Cowboy Popup
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:51 AM (#2495807)
I note that the yahoo boxscore has Wes Littleton of Texas picking up the save. I'm assuming that's a subtle joke.
There's a three inning rule too. I forget the specifics, but ESPN has him getting a save too, which means he probably got a save, which is incredible. I'm bookmarking the box score.
18. McCoy
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:52 AM (#2495808)
Hmm retrosheet looks like it has a glitch since it doesn't pick up the two 29 run games.
19. Ray (CTL)
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:52 AM (#2495809)
Littleton went three scoreless innings and didn't give up the lead, so he gets the save. It wasn't really a cheap save, though; in fairness, the score was only 14-3 when he entered the game.
20. Pops Freshenmeyer
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:53 AM (#2495812)
Did they cover?
21. McCoy
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:53 AM (#2495815)
So who wants to bet the Rangers lose 5-2 in the nightcap?
22. Tony H.
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:54 AM (#2495817)
So who wants to bet the Rangers lose 5-2 in the nightcap?
Screw that, I fully expect them to get no-hit.
23. SouthSideRyan
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:55 AM (#2495821)
So did they already set the record for most runs in a doubleheader?
24. AndrewJ
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:56 AM (#2495822)
I note that the yahoo boxscore has Wes Littleton of Texas picking up the save. I'm assuming that's a subtle joke.
In New York, Phil Mushnick is having an aneurysm even as we speak.
The Texas Rangers became the first team in 110 years to score 30 runs in a game
So that makes it the second time in Julio Franco's lifetime a team's scored 30?
25. BDC
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:56 AM (#2495823)
Well, Littleton came in with an 11-run lead and pitched three scoreless innings. 11-run leads can be lost, or at least whittled to dangerous proportions -- though admittedly 27-run leads probably haven't been lost since the Eckfords used to play the Mutuals.
I would have liked to see Littleton give up 24 runs in three innings and still get a save.
27. Ray (CTL)
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:57 AM (#2495827)
It's really not fair that the Rangers don't get to carry some of those runs over to the second game.
28. PreservedFish
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 12:58 AM (#2495829)
I coached a camp kickball team to a 30-0 victory, using the 10-run mercy rule in each of the three innings. My team was boys aged 8-10 from a regular summer camp ... the opposing team was co-ed, from a music camp called "Encore Coda."
The music camp boys and girls were extremely haughty. I caught two girls referring to my team - many of whom were little Dominican kids that didn't speak English - as "animals." So I didn't feel bad about destroying them. Even if they did have girls on their team. They were all little elitist brats.
29. Guapo
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 01:01 AM (#2495836)
I'll give Stark one to get started:
The Baltimore Orioles just gave up 30 runs. The most points surrendered by the Baltimore Ravens in any of their games last year was 26.
30. Ray (CTL)
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 01:01 AM (#2495839)
The music camp boys and girls were extremely haughty. I caught two girls referring to my team - many of whom were little Dominican kids that didn't speak English - as "animals." So I didn't feel bad about destroying them. Even if they did have girls on their team. They were all little elitist brats.
Hmm. Maybe some of the girls on the Orioles were making insensitive comments, which is why Texas didn't feel bad about running up the score.
31. AJMcCringleberry
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 01:01 AM (#2495840)
Cabrera gave up 9 hits and 6 runs and he was easily their best pitcher.
7/8 Rangers who reached via a BB came around to score.
33. Squash
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 01:03 AM (#2495846)
The O's pitchers gave up 6, 7, 8, and 9 runs. Too bad not respectively.
34. McLovin
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 01:08 AM (#2495858)
The 8th and 9th batters both had 7 RBI. As best I can tell, 14 RBI is the record for 8-9 hitters in the past 50 years. Anyone have an idea what the most RBI by any 2 consecutive hitters is? In the past 50 years, only one #9 hitter has driven in more than 7 runs - Tony Cloninger's famous game. Only four #8 hitters have driven in more than 7. James Loney had 9 just last year.
35. Yeaarrgghhhh
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 01:09 AM (#2495865)
at least the orioles will have a shot at winning the second game because the Rangers hitters will be exhaused from running around the bases so many times.
FIVE different Rangers set or tied their season high in RBIs in the game - Ramon Vazquez, Jarrod Saltalamacchia, David Murphy, Travis Metcalf, and Jason Botts.
Saltalamacchia had 17 RBIs in 208 at-bats this season. Then he had 7 RBI in ONE GAME.
Vazques had 17 RBIs in 227 at-bats this season. Then he had 7 RBI in that game as well.
Wes Littleton could have given up 8 runs in the seventh inning, 8 runs in the eighth inning, and 8 runs in the ninth inning - and STILL GOTTEN THE SAVE.
38. Spahn Insane
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 01:12 AM (#2495883)
I don't think I've even seen 30 runs in a softball game. Although I guess slaughter rules affect that somewhat.
I've played on a team that lost 37-14. (And my spring team won its championship game 27-5, in 4.5 innings.)
39. FelizForPresident
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 01:13 AM (#2495887)
So much for Teixeira...goodness!
40. BDC
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 01:13 AM (#2495888)
And the Rangers didn't even need Micah Owings.
41. McLovin
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 01:14 AM (#2495891)
Wes Littleton could have given up 8 runs in the seventh inning, 8 runs in the eighth inning, and 8 runs in the ninth inning - and STILL GOTTEN THE SAVE.
Don't the 3 innings have to be "effective"?
42. Kurt
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 01:15 AM (#2495899)
Wasn't the other highest scoring game in the last 10 years or so also Rangers/Orioles? 23-7 or something like that?
Edit: It was 26-7 Rangers, on 4/19/96. Oddly, there was a save in that game also, and not the 3 inning variety (Ed Vosberg got the last out in the top of the 8th of a 10-7 game, then the Rangers scored 16 in the bottom half before he closed it out).
43. BDC
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 01:15 AM (#2495900)
And despite watching dozens of Ranger games on TV in a completely useless year, I have managed to miss a no-hitter, a 600th home run, and a 30-run game.
Watching this on MLB.tv right now archive and I'm in the 7th, it is 14-3, and Palmer is talking about how they can't bring in Shuey, 'cuz he's a little too old to be able to pitch both games'. Little does he know, there's another 16 runs on the way.
46. PhillyBooster
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 01:17 AM (#2495907)
That's got to kill you in the Pythagorean standings.
47. Ray (CTL)
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 01:19 AM (#2495917)
Maybe the Orioles thought it was an exhibition game?
Rangers vs. Orioles, 8:35pm, Game Two: This Time It Counts.
48. Hombre Brotani
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 01:21 AM (#2495918)
Instant Classic®, baby.
49. Dr. Vaux
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 01:22 AM (#2495919)
At this point in the season they're all exhibition games except for teams that are in the race.
Seeing the box score on the Yahoo sports page, my first thought was that I'd accidentally clicked on the NFL tab. After I realized that it was a baseball score, I wondered just how badly demoralized the Trembley announcement must've made Baltimore, for them to roll over and die like that.
51. PreservedFish
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 01:25 AM (#2495927)
"Don't the 3 innings have to be "effective"?"
They changed the rule. It is no longer up to the official scorer's discretion. You pitch the last three innings of a win as a reliever, it's a save.
52. AndrewJ
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 01:25 AM (#2495928)
That's got to kill you in the Pythagorean standings
FYI: Teams outscoring their opponents by a 10-1 ratio, using Bill James's preferred exponent of 1.83 instead of 2, have awinning percentage of 0.985 ...
The 4/19/96 game was referenced earlier, Texas hung 16 in the home half of the 8th that year on Baltimore. Not to be surprised, all 26 runs in that game were also earned.
55. SouthSideRyan
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 01:33 AM (#2495948)
Rangers already up 3-0.
Tim Kurkijan was just on Baseball Tonight talking about it, and I realized he sounds exactly like Matthew Lesko.
56. kthejoker
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 01:34 AM (#2495951)
This also sets the modern record for margin of victory.
Back in '99 Nebraska beat Chicago State 50-3.
Anyone ever hear the story of Johnny Heisman and Cumberland College?
Also, Texas left 8 runners on base!
57. CraigK
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 01:38 AM (#2495959)
This game took one minute longer than the longest 1-0 9-inning game in MLB history (5/7/97) Oak at Mil, 3:20. Of note in that game, Brosius was thrown out at the plate to end the game, Brewers win, and HP Ump Dale Ford ejects Brosius even though game was over. Not sure if that went down as an official ejection. It was also freezing at the Old Third World Country Stadium that day.
68. Worrierking
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 02:04 AM (#2496043)
Tim Kurkijan was just on Baseball Tonight talking about it, and I realized he sounds exactly like Matthew Lesko.
Was he wearing a jacket with question marks all over it?
69. SouthSideRyan
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 02:07 AM (#2496060)
I'm gonna go play my copy of MVP Baseball 2005 with me with a 1.78 ERA; IT'S MORE ####### REALISTIC!
Pfft, I turned Rick Ankiel back into a pitcher in that game, he pitches every third day, so through 50 games, he's got about 150 innings of 0.28 ERA pitching with a 12+ K/9 and no walks. Hellll yeah.
71. TerpNats
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 03:29 AM (#2496171)
Apparently this was thr first time five players on one team had at least four RBI since the Phillies did it in their famed 23-22 win at Wrigley in May of 1979.
A few weeks ago, MASN encored the Nationals-Giants game where Bonds hit #756 (and the Nats came back to win) the following Sunday night. Wonder if Cuban Pete will let MASN replay this one?
72. Jeff K.
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 04:04 AM (#2496212)
As a Rangers fan who:
1) Owns Saltalamacchia in an NL-only league that lets you keep stats when players are traded to the AL
2) Was at the game where the Rangers scored 17 runs in one inning against the Orioles
let me say, WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Calculating game scores for the games I've been to really makes me appreciate a good start when it occurs. The average starter's game score for games I've attended is probably in the mid-40s.
Have there been any sub-zero game scores for starting pitchers? It's harder than you might think to give up THAT many runs and hits with THAT few innings.
77. CookieMonster!
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 04:34 AM (#2496269)
30 runs like 30 cookies. Even Cookie Monster think too much.
This was one hell of a game, but when the Red Sox scored 29 runs against the Browns in 1950, they'd just scored 20 against them the day before. And then the day after the 29 they scored 7 more, and lost 12 to 7.
So the Sox averaged nearly 19 runs a game for a three game series, still only came out one game ahead, and didn't pick up ground on the Yankees. Only in Boston.
Here's to Fenway Park: The solution to, and the cause of, all the Red Sox's problems.
OTOH the next year the Senators lost 5 games in 4 days, by a combined score of 57 to 7. That's got to be the all-time record.
Geez, I had no idea so many pitchers were left in to give up 12 or 15 runs. My dad always looks incredibly shocked when anything close to that happens.
The Phillies just scored 3 runs per game in Washington, and won the series. Then they scored 7 runs per game in Pittsburgh, and lost the series. I can just imagine what 19 runs per game including a loss would feel like.
84. a bebop a rebop
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 04:57 AM (#2496312)
Rangers line on the game: 517/569/860/1.429.
Does this put Barry's 2004 at 362/609/812/1.421 in perspective? Jeebus.
I knew Jason Jennings's 11-run outing this year would be up there.
Mike Oquist should be much better known than he is, for having the worst game score of the last 50 years. That's an achievement of Brian Kingmanesque significance.
86. Ray (CTL)
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 05:09 AM (#2496322)
Yeah, that 2004 season was a pretty decent effort by Bonds.
I know he's been the best hitter in the NL per PA this year, but I was surprised to learn that he leads the league in AB/HR (11.2). Only ARod is better in the majors, at 11.0.
87. Jeff K.
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 05:12 AM (#2496324)
Right; because games that happen once every 100 years really show how flawed the analysis is.
Wasn't the other highest scoring game in the last 10 years or so also Rangers/Orioles? 23-7 or something like that?
Edit: It was 26-7 Rangers, on 4/19/96. Oddly, there was a save in that game also, and not the 3 inning variety (Ed Vosberg got the last out in the top of the 8th of a 10-7 game, then the Rangers scored 16 in the bottom half before he closed it out).
The Cubs also beat the Rockies 26-7 on 8/18/95. As I recall, the crazy thing about that game was that it included a nearly 3-hour rain delay. Somehow the game wasn't called in spite of the fact that the home team was getting crushed and the game wasn't yet official. Saberhagen gave up 7 runs in 1/3 IP for a game score of 11. The Cubs brought in their closer, Randy Myers, for a scoreless 9th with a 19-run lead.
I know he's been the best hitter in the NL per PA this year, but I was surprised to learn that he leads the league in AB/HR (11.2).
It's a hollow victory though. He only leads because Rick Ankiel doesn't have enough PA to qualify.
90. Mark R. Garber
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 05:56 AM (#2496334)
This game was so bad that it might end the major league careers of 2 of the 4 Oriole pitchers.
This game was so bad that it might end the major league careers of 2 of the 4 Oriole pitchers.
Seriously, if you're 36-year-old Paul Shuey, aren't you thinking of walking away from the game right now?
92. Walt Davis
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 06:21 AM (#2496340)
So, at the end of the first game, Mark Jacobson (the official scorer) was reading off the time of game, attendance, line scores, winners and losers, and announced, "No Save".
I had to remind him that Littleton had pitched three scoreless innings, and he had to get back on the Press Box PA and announce "Correction... there is a save".
In the seventh inning, the game was infuriating: just get the damn thing over with!
By the eighth, it was hilarious. My favorite part was after Burres gave up the grand slam, he walked the next batter. THEN Trembley pulled him... as though THAT was the final straw!
94. alkeiper
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 06:47 AM (#2496349)
I actually attended the game, my first game at Camden Yards. Well worth the three hour drive.
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
That sent the game to the bottom of the ninth, with the Orioles needing 27 to tie, and 28 to win. Trembley apparently abandoned small ball and let his team swing away.
I don't believe I've ever seen a team (comprised of players above the age of 6) score 30 runs in a game.
EDIT: Apparently the joke's on me and the guy who came up with the save rule! See posts 14, 15, 17, and 19 below.
Did Littleton earn the easiest save in the history of baseball?
This from AP:
The Texas Rangers became the first team in 110 years to score 30 runs in a game, setting an American League record Wednesday in a 30-3 rout of the Baltimore Orioles.
It was the ninth time a major league team scored 30 runs, the first since Chicago set the major league record in a 36-7 rout of Louisville in a National League game on June 28, 1897, according to the Elias Sports Bureau.
The record for most runs scored by a team in a single game is 36, set by the Chicago Colts (now the Chicago Cubs) against the Louisville Colonels (which joined the National League in 1892) on June 29, 1897.
The modern-day record of 29 has been achieved on two occasions: The first was on June 8, 1950, by the Boston Red Sox against the St. Louis Browns (now the Baltimore Orioles). The second was on April 23, 1955, by the Chicago White Sox against the Kansas City Athletics (now the Oakland Athletics).
36 I believe by the Cubbies (well they weren't called Cubbies then) and the "modern" record is/was 26 set by 5 different franchises. Twice by the Cubs.
Three inning save. It's real, amazingly.
There's a three inning rule too. I forget the specifics, but ESPN has him getting a save too, which means he probably got a save, which is incredible. I'm bookmarking the box score.
Screw that, I fully expect them to get no-hit.
In New York, Phil Mushnick is having an aneurysm even as we speak.
The Texas Rangers became the first team in 110 years to score 30 runs in a game
So that makes it the second time in Julio Franco's lifetime a team's scored 30?
The music camp boys and girls were extremely haughty. I caught two girls referring to my team - many of whom were little Dominican kids that didn't speak English - as "animals." So I didn't feel bad about destroying them. Even if they did have girls on their team. They were all little elitist brats.
The Baltimore Orioles just gave up 30 runs. The most points surrendered by the Baltimore Ravens in any of their games last year was 26.
Hmm. Maybe some of the girls on the Orioles were making insensitive comments, which is why Texas didn't feel bad about running up the score.
And then die of exhaustion on the mound?
FIVE different Rangers set or tied their season high in RBIs in the game - Ramon Vazquez, Jarrod Saltalamacchia, David Murphy, Travis Metcalf, and Jason Botts.
Saltalamacchia had 17 RBIs in 208 at-bats this season. Then he had 7 RBI in ONE GAME.
Vazques had 17 RBIs in 227 at-bats this season. Then he had 7 RBI in that game as well.
Wes Littleton could have given up 8 runs in the seventh inning, 8 runs in the eighth inning, and 8 runs in the ninth inning - and STILL GOTTEN THE SAVE.
I've played on a team that lost 37-14. (And my spring team won its championship game 27-5, in 4.5 innings.)
Don't the 3 innings have to be "effective"?
Edit: It was 26-7 Rangers, on 4/19/96. Oddly, there was a save in that game also, and not the 3 inning variety (Ed Vosberg got the last out in the top of the 8th of a 10-7 game, then the Rangers scored 16 in the bottom half before he closed it out).
Rangers vs. Orioles, 8:35pm, Game Two: This Time It Counts.
They changed the rule. It is no longer up to the official scorer's discretion. You pitch the last three innings of a win as a reliever, it's a save.
FYI: Teams outscoring their opponents by a 10-1 ratio, using Bill James's preferred exponent of 1.83 instead of 2, have awinning percentage of 0.985 ...
Tim Kurkijan was just on Baseball Tonight talking about it, and I realized he sounds exactly like Matthew Lesko.
Back in '99 Nebraska beat Chicago State 50-3.
Anyone ever hear the story of Johnny Heisman and Cumberland College?
Also, Texas left 8 runners on base!
I'm gonna go play my copy of MVP Baseball 2005 with me with a 1.78 ERA; IT'S MORE ####### REALISTIC!
Hey, there's no shame in pitching to the score. You gotta stay loose out there sometimes.
Cubs and Brewers tied for the division lead...
No, I think it was 8.
According to b-r, the record for most team LOB since 1957 is 27, by Atlanta, in a game against the Phillies on May 4, 1973.
Atlanta lost 5-4 in 20 innings.
4 runs on 17 hits, 10 walks, 3 HBP, and 3 ROE.
Sorry, only 8 LOB
But Darren Dalton said we had until 2012 before the apocalypse.
hehehe.
Was he wearing a jacket with question marks all over it?
Pfft, I turned Rick Ankiel back into a pitcher in that game, he pitches every third day, so through 50 games, he's got about 150 innings of 0.28 ERA pitching with a 12+ K/9 and no walks. Hellll yeah.
A few weeks ago, MASN encored the Nationals-Giants game where Bonds hit #756 (and the Nats came back to win) the following Sunday night. Wonder if Cuban Pete will let MASN replay this one?
1) Owns Saltalamacchia in an NL-only league that lets you keep stats when players are traded to the AL
2) Was at the game where the Rangers scored 17 runs in one inning against the Orioles
let me say, WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Baltimore Bullpen ERA prior to this game: 4.94
Baltimore Bullpen ERA after this game: 5.48
That's just four innings of relief after four months of play.
Let's do game scores for the different Orioles pitchers:
Cabrera 28
Burres 4
Bell 14
Shuey 8
Bill Hagy was going to watch this, but he took the easy way out.
Have there been any sub-zero game scores for starting pitchers? It's harder than you might think to give up THAT many runs and hits with THAT few innings.
Right; because games that happen once every 100 years really show how flawed the analysis is.
So the Sox averaged nearly 19 runs a game for a three game series, still only came out one game ahead, and didn't pick up ground on the Yankees. Only in Boston.
Here's to Fenway Park: The solution to, and the cause of, all the Red Sox's problems.
OTOH the next year the Senators lost 5 games in 4 days, by a combined score of 57 to 7. That's got to be the all-time record.
To put the game in further perspective: Erik Bedard has allowed 31 runs in his past 17 starts. The Orioles gave up 30 over nine innings.
The Phillies just scored 3 runs per game in Washington, and won the series. Then they scored 7 runs per game in Pittsburgh, and lost the series. I can just imagine what 19 runs per game including a loss would feel like.
Does this put Barry's 2004 at 362/609/812/1.421 in perspective? Jeebus.
Mike Oquist should be much better known than he is, for having the worst game score of the last 50 years. That's an achievement of Brian Kingmanesque significance.
I know he's been the best hitter in the NL per PA this year, but I was surprised to learn that he leads the league in AB/HR (11.2). Only ARod is better in the majors, at 11.0.
Way to snark, except I agree.
Name IP H R ER BB SO ERA
D Cabrera 5 9 6 6 1 4 5.10
Who would have guessed, at that point, that he would end up with the best line of any Orioles' pitcher?
Edit: It was 26-7 Rangers, on 4/19/96. Oddly, there was a save in that game also, and not the 3 inning variety (Ed Vosberg got the last out in the top of the 8th of a 10-7 game, then the Rangers scored 16 in the bottom half before he closed it out).
The Cubs also beat the Rockies 26-7 on 8/18/95. As I recall, the crazy thing about that game was that it included a nearly 3-hour rain delay. Somehow the game wasn't called in spite of the fact that the home team was getting crushed and the game wasn't yet official. Saberhagen gave up 7 runs in 1/3 IP for a game score of 11. The Cubs brought in their closer, Randy Myers, for a scoreless 9th with a 19-run lead.
I know he's been the best hitter in the NL per PA this year, but I was surprised to learn that he leads the league in AB/HR (11.2).
It's a hollow victory though. He only leads because Rick Ankiel doesn't have enough PA to qualify.
Seriously, if you're 36-year-old Paul Shuey, aren't you thinking of walking away from the game right now?
That would make a mockery of the game.
I had to remind him that Littleton had pitched three scoreless innings, and he had to get back on the Press Box PA and announce "Correction... there is a save".
In the seventh inning, the game was infuriating: just get the damn thing over with!
By the eighth, it was hilarious. My favorite part was after Burres gave up the grand slam, he walked the next batter. THEN Trembley pulled him... as though THAT was the final straw!
You said it, Cookie. 30 runs is a sometimes food.
And you didn't visit me? I'm offended... person whose name I don't recognize...
Heck, the Jays could only muster one run in 7.2 IP off Esteban Loaiza who was making his first start of 2007.
I weep.
The knot goes behind the left ear--right?
Best Regards
John
Hey, you guys are like the Red sox!
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main