User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.5799 seconds
48 querie(s) executed
| ||||||||
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Discussion
| ||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Thursday, October 06, 2022Twins’ Luis Arraez tops Aaron Judge as AL batting champion
RoyalsRetro (AG#1F)
Posted: October 06, 2022 at 01:03 PM | 63 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags: aaron judge, luis arraez |
Login to submit news.
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: OMNICHATTER for Opening Week 2023!
(21 - 2:32pm, Mar 30) Last: Dr Pol is what America needs Newsblog: The Official Mets Fan Self-Immolation Thread (994 - 2:23pm, Mar 30) Last: Lassus Newsblog: 2023 NBA Regular Season Thread (1350 - 2:18pm, Mar 30) Last: Hombre Brotani Sox Therapy: Over/Under (70 - 1:43pm, Mar 30) Last: jacksone (AKA It's OK...) Newsblog: Masyn Winn’s confidence high after sublime camp with Cardinals: ‘I think I belong up here’ (9 - 1:19pm, Mar 30) Last: Perry Newsblog: 2023 MLB predictions: Wild Cards, Playoffs, World Series, more (17 - 1:09pm, Mar 30) Last: cardsfanboy Newsblog: Minor leaguers, MLB reach tentative deal on 1st CBA, sources say (10 - 12:55pm, Mar 30) Last: The Duke Newsblog: All 30 MLB stadiums, ranked: 2023 edition (58 - 12:36pm, Mar 30) Last: Howie Menckel Hall of Merit: Reranking Right Fielders: Results (34 - 2:55am, Mar 30) Last: bjhanke Newsblog: ‘OOTP Baseball:’ How a German programmer created the deepest baseball sim ever made (31 - 12:16am, Mar 30) Last: catomi01 Newsblog: Sioux City Rep. J.D. Scholten pitches legislative ban on MLB television blackouts in Iowa (4 - 11:06pm, Mar 29) Last: RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Newsblog: Phillies trade for Cristian Pache, put Rhys Hoskins on 60-day IL (2 - 11:01pm, Mar 29) Last: Howie Menckel Newsblog: Guardians finalizing 7-year extension with Giménez (17 - 10:03pm, Mar 29) Last: Adam Starblind Newsblog: Yankees sign Franchy Cordero in Opening Day roster twist (5 - 6:59pm, Mar 29) Last: Walt Davis Newsblog: Red Sox drop trademark applications for 'Boston', blame MLB (19 - 6:05pm, Mar 29) Last: Zach |
|||||||
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2021 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.5799 seconds |
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. DarrenFun player and this is a really fun quote. Fun. Lots of fun.
Pretty impressive. That's 3 fewer defensive positions than Oswaldo Cabrera played in just 47 games. All that he lacked was 1B, C and P.
(No, I'm not saying Cabrera is more valuable than a batting champion. But for versatility he's hard to beat.)
It's like watching the Simpsons episode on Poochie:
"Every time Poochie's not on the screen, all the other characters should be looking around saying "Where's Poochie?"
If we're not talking about how all the Yankees are Very Special Boys, we're not doing it right
With the Twins uniform, and the position, seems the best comp is Carew. Rod Carew without the speed.
I guess that could be Wade Boggs, but Boggs walked a lot more and was a good defensive 3B. Arraez is like Carew in that he can play 2B, but particularly good at it, and fits better at first.
Trying to figure out if there's a way we can also give Judge a batting title. Maybe the division crown? After all, division records have always been a big deal in baseball's lengthy history.
Trying to figure out how Arraez can get the Twins into the LCS before he dies. (smile)
That's a great call. Obviously not Carew but his was the first name in mind. How many singles hitting first basemen win a batting title? Grace didn't, Erstad didn't. That's just two names off the top of my head, I'm sure there are more guys like them but how many won batting titles? Billy Goodman was all over the diamond when he won his title.
Keith Hernandez did, although I wouldn't say he was a single hitter as he led the league in doubles that year, but only had 11 hr. (Grace also had 51 doubles one year, so by singles hitting, I'm guessing you meant low hr hitters.... Erstad did have 25 one year though. (he was mostly an outfielder that year though)
In his first year at first, he was second in BA to the previously mentioned Hernandez.
Pete Rose I assume. Confusing because it follows a post about Pete Runnels.
Bill Buckner won a title with 10 HR, though he had 41 doubles.
Yes.
Or we can cast this meaningless, contrived, obsolete statistic into the dustbin of history where it belongs
Babe Ruth only won one "batting title" . Who cares?
he wasn't a home run hitter, but it's hard to describe a guy with 67 and 69 XBHs as a singles hitter. He slugged over .500 both times.
Ferris Fain 1952 - .102
Rod Carew 1978 - .108
Ferris Fain 1952 - .127
Pete runnels 1962 - .130
Bill Buckner 1980 - .133
Phil Cavaretta 1945 - .145
Dale Alexander 1932 - .145
Mickey Vernon 1946 - .155
Lew Fonseca 1929 - .163
Keith Hernandez 1979 - .169
What is the upper bound of ISO in which one should not be considered a singles hitter?
Imagine wasting precious minutes of your life coming onto this thread to post this comment.
meaningless is subjective as is obsolete, but how is a batting title contrived?
this sounds contrived
they do not remove walks from OBP, OBP measures just that, OBP. Slugging captures extra base hits. Batting average measures how often a player puts the ball in play, that has it's own value and combined with other things gives you a picture of the type of hitter someone is.
Not contrived but measures something that you apparently do not care about, which is why I grant you the subjectiveness of you not liking it.
I as someone who likes the ball being put into play like players with high batting average. As a fan of my team winning I prefer someone getting on base in anyway possible, but as a fan of baseball walks are boring as hell. I hate walks unless they are helping my team.
It doesn't make him look better, it means exactly what it means. He's better at getting hits on a per at bat basis. I mean you could create a stat that is hits per plate appearance, but nobody really wants one like that.
There are hundreds of stats out there, most of them don't mean a player is better than another player if they do better in it, and same with batting average. It means what it means.
I mean I'm assuming you approve of Slugging, but it also removes walks from the equation.
It's not offensive. It's just pointless.
Would anyone argue that DiMaggio's hitting streak is ridiculous because it's just a thing we use to make him sound better than Ted Williams, (who was better offensively in 1941 than DiMaggio was during the actual streak?)
It just is what it is. Arraez won the batting title, Judge did not. That seems to really bother a whole lot of people on these boards, who have first tried to diminish the *way* it was done (Arreaz sat games out....waaaah!!!!) and apparently have now moved on to just saying "Who cares!!!!! Aaron Judge is still better!!!!"
Like, let it go. Judge has been the center of the baseball world for three solid months. He is going to win the MVP, probably unanimously. His team is going to the playoffs. We're allowed to celebrate the accomplishments of other players.
That seems a stretch, at least the two Angel writers will probably vote for Ohtani, and I wouldn't be surprised to see him sweep the entire western division writers.
The first part isn't a stretch at all. The second part could be, which is why I qualified it with "probably", and not "And there is no chance, in the slightest, that he won't be unanimous"
There are many, many statistics that make certain players look better than Aaron Judge when those statistics are viewed without context. It's why when we're discussing them, we don't use them to say "Arraez is better than Judge." Arraez was, this season, better at getting on base when he hit the ball. I happen to like that metric, even if it doesn't provide a comprehensive picture of value.
Pedant alert. Judge got on base .448 of the time when he hit the ball. Arraez did so .343 of the time.
Sigh. Fair enough. Batting average is a good measure of how well a player can hit the ball where the fielders aren't. Arraez was slightly better at that than Judge this season. I like it.
Person who gets on base the most frequent when they refuse to walk. :)
Your comment didn't offend me. It made me sad for you.
But BA also includes homers. I don't see any of these points that wouldn't include the HRs.
I think the poster was just clarifying that they weren't using babip.
Hey, you're the first person ever to think of this!
Give me a ring when you get back from 2001.
Had he sat he would have preserved the Triple Crown
Edit: plus what #53 said. Arraez likely doesn't sit those games if he was trailing in the batting race and Judge had already deactivated himself.
Or get hit by pitch, or hit sacrifice flies, or reach on an error. But some of these things are treated differently than others.
Which isn't to say that AVG is worthless, just weird.
Or catcher's interference, or a dropped third strike, or a fielder's choice.
This is the 5th straight year that strikeouts have outnumbered hits, and it isn't helped by umpires who persist in expanding the strike zone beyond its rule book standard,s without any accountability other than a vague hint about the possibility of robo-umps.
For the record, his hamstrings were a mess by the end of the season, and without the batting title race, there is a good chance he just would have sat out way more games or just hit the IL. He wanted to win the batting title race and wanted to do it the right way. He is a good and fun player.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main