Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Saturday, June 01, 2013
Stepping back, this also raises the question: Why do we all too frequently seek to invoke rituals that, in the end, undermine our common bonds? Not everyone in our nation or at the ballpark shares the same beliefs. From which god are we asking these blessings? What does the good secular humanist or atheist do during this song? Are we to assume that all deities will be in concert for those who believe in more than one?
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Nothing, because a good atheist treats it like any other song or artwork prominently featuring a fictional character. A bad atheist whines about it.
Yes, but they didn't start playing "A Boy Named Sue" or "Popeye the Sailor Man" because of 9/11, and strangers never yell at other strangers for not taking off their hats for those songs. And if they did play "Popeye," the police would let you walk whenever you chose to walk during it, even before the finitch.
Bingo. I'm an atheist and get upset with the other atheists of the world that act like the word god is a personal attack on their beliefs. I love Dawkins, but the man needs to take a chill pill.
I refuse to stand for this song, not because it invokes god, but because it's a crappy song. It's not the National Anthem or Marine Corps Hymn so it doesn't really rate me standing up or acknowledging it any more than a Justin Bieber song.
That's really stretching the definition of the term there.
Nothing, because a good atheist treats it like any other song or artwork prominently featuring a fictional character. A bad atheist whines about it.
Sounds like something from the Atheist Highlights' Goofus and Gallant.
I wasn't thinking of this song in particular. More of, say, the literal deus ex machina in a Greek play (although I might whine about it because it's lazy writing).
It seems like your problem is more with the patriotic than the religious aspect.
I think his problem is people who conflate being religious and being patriotic.
TSSB, the first stanza, anyway, is 10x the song, and 1000x more appropriate after 9/11.
This, especially the flatulently bombastic Kate Smith version that plays in the middle of the 7th inning of every game at NYS ...
Well I think it's fair to say that most people don't have a problem with it. If most of the stadium refused to stand, or even a large minority, or there were fights every time they played the song, teams would probably do something different.
And while I agree with your point, Clapper, I also suspect a lot of the fans (maybe not a majority but a notable segment) don't "seem" to have a problem with the song because they: a) feel obligated to stand, or b) they don't feel like expending the energy at that moment to be non-conformist and, frequently, face the belligerent scolding of some fat guy with a beer, or c) they just don't give this sort of thing much thought. I would bet that elimination of God Bless America at baseball games would inspire very little protest.
Possibly, but my point was that you could say the same about continuing it.
Nothing, because a good atheist treats it like any other song or artwork prominently featuring a fictional character. A bad atheist whines about it.
Absolutely. There's a certain species of human being that specializes in making mountains out of molehills, and God Bless America has got to be the tiniest molehill imaginable. Compared to all the other ####### music they blast you with from the time you enter the ballpark until the time you leave, GBA is practically a relief.
OTOH, I'd love to see our National Anthem changed to something that more than 1 out of 635,232 people can actually sing.
I'd much rather hear them play the fourth stanza of TSSB than GBA. Much more appropriate after 9/11, as well.
Probably not, but there's really no need for any kind of amplified noise between innings.
OTOH, I'd love to see our National Anthem changed to something that more than 1 out of 635,232 people can actually sing.
Try La Marseillaise, or even better, the most beautiful national anthem in the world.
Because flags have a short memory.
Try again, red diaper baby boy ...
heh... I used to sit that one out starting in junior high school.
moronic crap.
They still made your classes say it in junior high? They didn't have us do it past elementary school.
Try again, red diaper baby boy ...
Oh, please. That was the current Russian anthem I linked to. The Soviet Union croaked 22 years ago, but their anthem was so beautiful that the Russians decided to keep it, and for good reason.
As for Jimi Hendrix (or Marvin Gaye, or Jose Feliciano, etc.) I'll take any good military band's non-vocal version of the SSB, or Robert Merrill's if you want a vocal version. I suppose that makes me a red diaper fascist, but whatever.
Nah, just means you have no taste, to go along with no sense ...
[edit]
We recited the pledge every day through high school. Carlton Huff, in 11th grade, decided to start sitting it out. The rest of us responded with a collective "Holy ####, you can do that?"
heh... I used to sit that one out starting in junior high school.
moronic crap.
Good thing BTF wasn't around when they added "under God" to the pledge. That thread might have set a record that PETCO could only dream of.
well, junior high for me was 1968... elementary school was all Catholicy... a good education but we learned math by counting angels and instead of the Pledge of Allegiance we had Confirmation aka Soldiers of Christ.
Mais non.
I can imagine the process that got this article into the Washington Post:
"Boss! I wanna write an article about this guy who won't stand up for 'God Bless America'!"
"Who gives a crap? It's just a jingoistic song that makes it easier to go to war and stuff! And if someone says 'God bless America, they're insinuating that America is better than other countries, and we know that's not true!"
"But...this guy's a minister!"
"You mean..."
"Yep! One of them Jesus freaks is turning on their own...!"
(Grabs phone) "Stop the presses! New front page...!"
legs??
Well then, how about some government approved calisthenics?
(No worry about GBA up here in Toronto!)
I'll have you know you can take my oath to a piece of cloth, later amended to include the presence of a diety, when you pry it from my cold dead hand (placed patriotically over my heart).
This, on the other hand, seems like it could be a fascinating discussion to me. I don't think it's precisely what you're getting at, but the politics of gesture and self-presentation I find endlessly interesting. Teasing out the differences between the "actual" self and the "performed" self is a fun (and possibly impossible) exercise!
As an aside:
Berlin supported the presidential candidacy of General Dwight Eisenhower, and his song "I Like Ike" featured prominently in the Eisenhower campaign. In his later years he also became more conservative in his views on music. According to his daughter, "He was consumed by patriotism." He often said, "I owe all my success to my adopted country" and once rejected his lawyers' advice to invest in tax shelters, insisting, "I want to pay taxes. I love this country."[29]:80
From the wiki entry on Irving Berlin.
This is ridiculous. There's a lot of context with regards to God Bless America that matters, particularly to those without faith. God Bless America isn't some random song that happens to mention God.
God Bless America conflates patriotism with religiosity. As a patriotic atheist, I am uncomfortable with that idea, particularly since there are many people in this country that think that my non-belief prevents me from being moral or a good American. It's a song that doesn't represent me, where America The Beautiful or the national anthem does.
I also think that using a religious song as a response to an religiously-motivated attack perpetuates the idea that there's "our God, that blesses America" and "your misguided version of God, that hates us." As someone who thinks that belief is the primary motivating force behind most conflicts in the world, I'm not in favor of following up one display of religion with another.
It's also a really bad song. The lyrics are forced ("white with foam" is really terrible) and the musical emphasis is in silly places.
Finally, I think there should only be one song played during the 7th inning stretch, and that's "Take Me Out To The Ballgame." Everything else is really just overkill and adds a long delay right when the game is getting into some of the most delicious tension.
Even with that, when God Bless America is played, I sit silently in my seat. I don't tell other people not to stand up or sing along. I don't complain to the people around me. The only serious problem I have with God Bless America is that there are people who don't respect my right to opt out of participating, whatever my reasons may be.
Because acting your beliefs is hard. You might have to invest time or real money into it. Standing up for a song, bragging on Facebook about how you'll never visit Chick-Fil-A again or sticking a yellow ribbon on your car (which Bill Maher pointed out, is literally the least you can do) is much easier. Basically it's a symptom of a country that's lazy.
By the way, Morty's quote from Wikipedia made me look at Irving Berlin's page. It's still a hacktastic song, but he sounded like a rather admirable human being.
That's how I feel about wedding vows. Redoing them seems like taking a mulligan, like an admission of cheating. "I kind of meant it the first time around but now I REALLY mean it." Of course my wife doesn't agree with my impeccable logic.
The song I really really can't stand is "God Bless the USA" which is just utter hack work.
Not the anthem, but I like this Welsh rugby song:
We don't wanna be,
Your enemy,
But when we're on the field,
It's red, white and green,
Got beat by the Irish,
Got beat by the Scots,
The French had a struggle,
But you're the one we want,
As long as we beat the English,
As long as we beat the English,
As long as we beat the English, we don't care
Mais non.
That's a close second, but unless it's led by Paul Henreid and accompanied by futile counter-singing by Conrad Veidt and his Stormtrooper Chorus, it can't beat the Russkies.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
That quote alone elevates Irving Berlin above 99% of the people who call themselves "conservatives".
You're lucky you don't listen to Washington sports talk radio during Dallas Week, when the Redskins are entering it with about a 3 and 9 record.
The biggest group of tax cheats in America are federal government employees, about 90% of whom are Obama-worshipping red diaper doper babies.
I'll see your Wales, and raise you a Scotland,
And that's not even Scotland's best national anthem.
Hmmmm. . . .who was in the White House and had majority control of both houses in 2007 and 2008? Which way does the majority of the military lean?
Over half the the money owed from delinquent Federal employees comes from retired military and civilian employees. Yep, that is group that is overwhelmingly Democratic.
That "live" part might be a little difficult these days.
Hmmmm. . . .who was in the White House and had majority control of both houses in 2007 and 2008? Which way does the majority of the military lean?
Remember, kids: everything bad is the Republicans fault! Always!
I only stand for GBA when it is sung live and in person by Kate Smith.
Here you go.
And I'm not "siding with Joey B"; I'm merely pointing out your foolishness. (It's starting to look like a full-time job.)
My foolishness? Saying the majority of retired people lean right is foolish? Joey B made a stupid and silly statement. I rebutted that statement with some reasonable statements. But I'm being foolish? I think you're showing us all who is being foolish here.
Thank god you're here to tell us all who I really am. Otherwise nobody would have been capable of making up their own mind.
The biggest group of tax cheats in America are federal government employees, about 90% of whom are Obama-worshipping red diaper doper babies.
Total amount of taxes owed by delinquent federal employees in 2008, according to Joey's link: $3 billion
Total tax 2008 shortfall due to underreporting and other forms of tax evasion by all Americans: $450 - $500 billion
That'd pay for a lot of fresh diapers to replace Joey's brown-stained Pampers. Not that little Joey doesn't have enough BS in him to run through the whole $500 billion in a few short weeks.
There is no distinction. The performed self is the only self. Anything else is mere theory and spin.
We need to get Dan involved to do some deep linguistic forensics of your writing style if we're going to determine who you really are.
Quoted for truth. It is a terrible song.
Also posting to express my disappointment it took all the way to post 55 for the thread to devolve into yet another political pissing match. I put my money on post 30.
Nutopian International Anthem
DB
#46 covers much of my feelings on the subject. The last thing those scumbags did on this earth while aiming for the Twin Towers (et al) was to scream about how God was leading them to glory. Saying "nuh-uh, God roots for America, pal" ennobles that shit, it doesn't refute it. The terrorists reduced themselves to crumbs almost a dozen years ago, and we're still debating them in the key of F major.
However, "God Bless America" is not a terrible song. You try writing one sometime that's almost entirely three- and four-syllable lines and includes internal rhymes. It's a neat little construction.
The phrase "God bless America" is a request, not a declarative statement.
Finally, a sensible comment!
Because the "God Bless America" stadium experience is all about meekness and humility. "Take me out to the ballgame" is also a request, and yet context has made it otherwise.
I thought you had better things to do.
I reckon I'm going to experience it week after next, so it's a good thing I'm braced for it :)
And it's odd, because the Kate Smith recording used to knock 'em dead at the Spectrum before Flyers games back in the '70s. Sometimes Kate herself would show up to sing it. Great stuff, but it was a different era in lots of ways.
You can hate on your fellow ballpark patrons all you want, but I wouldn't blame the song that they're misinterpreting.
I liked Days of the New's cover of that one.
I'm partial to the The Stars and Stripes Forever and Semper Fidelis
Columbia the Gem of the Ocean ain't half-bad, but the language is pretty archaic.
What do you think I meant by "fun"?
Not the anthem, but I like this Welsh rugby song:
C'mon, Men of Harlech puts that to shame.
I'll give you the first, but no way in hell is This Land is your land anywhere in the neighborhood of being a good patriotic song. It's on par with GBA and America the Beautiful in boringness, uninspiring and just plain non-emotion evoking. A patriotic song should inspire or at least create a sense of pride... This Land is your land might create pride for a travel agent, but that is about it.
Give me Neil Diamond's America over that Woody Guthrie song, everyday of the week.
Now there is a guy showing some taste.
Canada doesn't seem to fair as well. There's the anthem of course, the Travellers' version of "This Land Is Your Land" (which has to be docked patriotism points for being an alternate version to someone else's patriotic song). Sam Roberts' "The Canadian Dream". (with the jaunty chorus of "S-O-C-I-A-L-I-S-M is here to stay, S-O-C-I-A-L-I-S-M is the only way"). I suppose Stan Rogers or Stompin' Tom Connors must have some patriotic ditties in their catalogues.
It doesn't quite work in this context, but I've always liked Joel Plaskett's "True Patriot Love" as an interesting way to blend heart-break and Canadian-American relations into one song.
O' Canada! is a pretty great anthem. It's just a notch behind the French, German and Polish anthems, which are the tops in my book.
And, My Country 'Tis of Thee dominates the category of bad alternative version of someone else's song. You just can't use the Anthem of the country you rebelled against as your own patriotic song.
About 40 years after I graduated, I discovered that that was what my high school song stole the melody from.
It's an awesome song.
One of my Alma Maters uses the tune of Deutschland, Deutschland, or the Kaiserlied, if you prefer to hearken back to Haydn.
I was pretty shocked when I first heard it coming from the chapel as I was walking past.
the best part was that the team that appropriated it had the league's dirtiest player in Bobby Clarke, the most egregious diver of all time in Bill Barber, and a collection of street thugs in hockey skates known as "the Broad Street Bullies."
God Bless America, indeed, lol
Though since those two guys weren't American it can kind of work. "God bless America...but not these hooligans!"
If you think This Land Is Your Land is a patriotic song, or lacking emotional content, you're leaving off the most important fourth and sixth verses:
I also wasn't a huge fan of America the Beautiful until I heard the Ray Charles version. I think you've got to give Stars and Stripes Forever some props too.
And of course, the theme song from Team America: World Police.
The Albion Band - Ragged Heroes
America the Beautiful cleans GBA's clock without breaking a sweat. The Stars and Stripes Forever stands proudly and impeccably at AtB's side. And both great songs graciously and sincerely call This Land is Your Land up to the front of the stage to share it as an equal.
What's unfortunate is that the above actually has to be explained.
I know it's not polite to say so, but there are many agnostic and atheists who understand that beliefs, particularly in the more conventional gods, are scarcely veiled forms of insanity. We've made a nightly ritual of the Theater of Absurd--having police enforce the appearance of fealty during the singing of the theme song to Caspar the Friendly Ghost.
You're hardly the only one to assert this, but it doesn't make sense to me. The writer is explaining an action; an action that strikes me as entirely reasonable. Quite simply he doesn't want to do something he's expected to do, and on occasion will be reviled for not doing. So, he tells us why he behaves as he does.
He's not being silly about it. He's not doing something as clearly demented as boycotting ball games in order to protest a plainly foolish ritual.
It was worth your time to post why this wouldn't be worth your time--why isn't it worth a couple of hours of the writer's time to explain himself?
In any case, if the writer's article emboldens a few more people, which in turn emboldens a few more... that's in part how we move past silly rituals, conformity, and superstition, and towards reason.
Loved it as a kid in this flick.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main