User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.7370 seconds
46 querie(s) executed
| ||||||||
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Discussion
| ||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Thursday, August 01, 2013Watching Like a Girl: How mainstream sports reporting gets female fandom wrongIf it weren’t for women at baseball games, us stat nerds would never know what one looked like!
RoyalsRetro (AG#1F)
Posted: August 01, 2013 at 02:21 PM | 124 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags: fans, toronto, women in baseball |
Login to submit news.
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: Rosenthal: Fernando Tatis Jr. open to position change? Plus MLB trade notes - The Athletic $
(1 - 10:39am, Jul 02) Last: Pat Rapper's Delight (as quoted on MLB Network) Newsblog: 2022 NBA Playoffs thread (3737 - 10:13am, Jul 02) Last: MHS Newsblog: Nationals burned by quirky 'fourth-out rule' as Pirates score despite lining into inning-ending double play (59 - 9:57am, Jul 02) Last: Misirlou cut his hair and moved to Rome Newsblog: Yankees looking for OF help with Aaron Hicks, Joey Gallo struggling (15 - 9:49am, Jul 02) Last: Ron J Newsblog: Independence Day Weekend OMNICHATTER, for July 1-4, 2022 (16 - 9:34am, Jul 02) Last: Dillon Gee Escape Plan Newsblog: Outfielder Austin Hays becomes sixth player in Baltimore Orioles history to hit for cycle (3 - 2:04am, Jul 02) Last: FernandoPoplar Newsblog: Why Juan Soto’s Reported Extension Offer Is Not As Outlandish As It Might Seem (20 - 11:54pm, Jul 01) Last: Howie Menckel Newsblog: When do the Tigers and Royals have to admit that 'rebuilding' has turned into plain old losing? (22 - 9:37pm, Jul 01) Last: Howie Menckel Newsblog: Ranking the home uniforms of all 30 MLB teams (24 - 9:29pm, Jul 01) Last: Joey Joe Joe Junior Felix Jose Cruz Junior Sox Therapy: Hey Now (15 - 9:06pm, Jul 01) Last: Jose is Absurdly Correct but not Helpful Newsblog: Boston media explodes after Red Sox blow it without unvaccinated closer Houck (91 - 7:53pm, Jul 01) Last: Mellow Mouse, Benevolent Space Tyrant Newsblog: Rob Manfred wants you to know: He doesn't hate baseball, he wants to save it (46 - 7:35pm, Jul 01) Last: Doug Jones threw harder than me Sox Therapy: Now That's A Road Trip (46 - 7:15pm, Jul 01) Last: Captain Joe Bivens, Pointless and Wonderful Newsblog: OMNICHATTER for Thursday, June 30, 2022 (16 - 4:47pm, Jul 01) Last: Textbook Editor Newsblog: Frustrated Mike Trout Spots His Own Pitcher Tipping Pitches While Standing in Center Field (56 - 1:54pm, Jul 01) Last: Pat Rapper's Delight (as quoted on MLB Network) |
|||||||
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2021 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.7370 seconds |
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
My efforts in finding a "female fandom," well, as a stat-oriented fan you either have to deal with environments full of men of various levels of hostility or you end up in an all-girl group where the majority thinks "math is hard" and has a fandom that consists of reblogging pictures of "hot guys" on Tumblr and/or writing dirty fanfic about said hot guys. Help me.
You could try hanging out with the male sportswriter contingent, who think "math is hard", and write dirty fanfic about Jeter's calm eyes...
In my experience Title IX has generated increased interest in sports in women, and on average the younger age cohorts are more interested in sports. One of the many good things from Title IX.
If they are going to baseball games for the eye candy, then they picked the wrong sport...
Men like watching sports a lot more than women. Noted and accepted.
I personally think the notion that 4 out of 5 women at MLB games aren't there for the game is a very biased, subjective opinion.
This deserves a Primey.
Which is one of the reasons why my wife doesn't like watching baseball nearly as much as I do (she tolerates it). She surprised me the other night when she told me she wished I was a soccer fan.
You can only control for so many variables.
I do not know any women who are hardcore MLB-wide baseball fans, but I know lots of women who are perfectly typical fans of the home team.
EDIT: Hell, even I'm not a hardcore MLB-wide fan; I have only a passing notion of what's going on in the NL.
Of course. Toned bodies, short shorts, tight fitting tops that they are knowen to lift or remove on occasion... better hair too.
I'd say hockey games for eye candy (fandom, I mean)-- and FWIW, and maybe this is because I'm more of a casual hockey fan - they also tend to know their stuff.
I dated a girl in college and and a bit post-college that was a big baseball fan. This was pre-analytics days - but her knowledge of the Twins rivaled mine of the Cubs and she probably had as many dog-eared BJ Baseball Abstracts as I did from the 80s. It worked out quite well - we'd go to Comiskey for Twins/Sox games and both be rooting for the Twins, and in return, she'd wear a Cubs cap and join me in rooting for the Cubs when we hit Wrigley.
In fact, with one or two exceptions among my male friends who could keep pace with her - I'd say we probably had better conversations on the game than I had with most other people I went to games with. We both thought the sac but was overused, both considered the White Sox and Yankees dominions of evil (I guess I could only get her to classify the Cardinals as "probably evil", though I would only that far concerning the Brewers, too - so we were even on that account).
In retrospect, I'm thinking that letting her get away might have been a mistake...
Absent any other information, then yeah, sounds like it.
I recall baseball chick was a particular fan of Brad Ausmus, and not because of his all-star bat. And I'm pretty sure no one here would try to claim that she isn't also a real baseball fan.
In Toronto anyway I'd say the Leafs have no shortage of female fans who know their ####. Of course the Leafs have no shortage of fans in any category really.
Agreed, although her lust was not reserved solely for Ausmus iirc. An OF or two as well, am pretty sure.
My mother is an exemplary baseball fan, but she only ever referred to Ausmus as "Cute Brad Ausmus." I've never heard her call him anything else.
(Referring to the Leafs, of course; not the fans themselves.)
I don't know of anything, sorry. I can see how that would be frustrating.
Maybe this is one of those "be the change you want to see" situations. Have you thought about starting your own stats-oriented site for female fans? I bet there's a market for it.
There is another one that posts sporadically, (Devil In a Blue Cap?...or is it red?)
I'm wondering who all these men are that are hostile to knowledgeable female baseball fans?
How do they function in the real world? Practically every work place these days has large numbers of smart, accomplished women, and if you're in a quantitative field, they're good at math too.
I've always enjoyed working for and with women, better than working with most men. Much less ego-driven bullshit.
Another question might be how this hostility manifests itself. An individual can be a jerk without him* thinking of himself as a jerk in a plethora of ways.
*Or "her" obviously.
I have zero time for it. It's more a wish for a generalist forum, anyway--I find that Brew Crew Ball on SBN is a generally non-sexist environment, stat-friendly, with enough female members who know their stuff.
I totally cosign this. I much prefer having female management. They (in general) listen so much better and there is much less BS. Some of that might be biased samples though. Since I am in IT, which is male dominated, the females that do make it in management are pretty much the best of the best.
I've noticed that I get along better with managers/peers/superiors that are female, or men at least 10-15 years older.
Men around the same age generally seem to view me as a threat, especially the ones whose schtick is to be "the smartest guy in the room".
Thankfully, my current boss is an exception to this "threat" paradigm, despite being almost as smart as me ;-)
Edit: and, before someone gets snarky, I know the correct grammar for that last clause. I just choose not to use it b/c it sounds stupid.
Getting there. Step by step. It will happen at roughly the same time we are post-racial, which will mean the end of my favorite A-Rod meme.
Every female partner I worked for was an absolute nightmare. I think this had a lot to do with the profession and firm, however, since it was a fairly sexist environment and the women who climbed the ladder usually had to be, or felt they had to be, unrelenting ball-busters.
There are enough good female baseball writers out there - Emma Span, Amy K Nelson, Susan Slusser - its kinda weird that the notion of women watching baseball to enjoy baseball is not more widespread.
Imma let you finish, but Batgirl of Twins fandom was the greatest baseball blog of all time. OF ALL TIME.
For the life of me I cannot remember what inspired it, but for some reason I remember looking up Emma Span because she once wrote something that made me very angry (and I've been angry about 3 times in the past 15 years). Something to do with being a Yankee fanboy, or fangirl as the case may be.
EDIT: Sadly I missed most of the Batgirl blog. Though I do recall a lego recreation of a brawl in which Michael Barrett and AJ Pierzynski featured prominently which was possibly the greatest thing I've ever seen.
Re-read post 3.
Not sure how regular is defined. There were at least one or two others besides her, bbc, and the lurking Devil.
Batgirl was pretty great. She had a graphic with Joe Mauer that I've looked for a few times since that site's demise - I wanted it as a t-shirt or poster.
A different thing, but I liked marinerds.blogspot.com (Deanna Rubin) as well.
My ex-FIL (banking IT) used to only hire women, using thinking along the lines of #36.
I think you mean post-species-ist.
The same ones who listen to sports talk radio.
Ditto. Especially in IT, I've found that women that have risen to leadership levels really, really know their #### -- I work with a lot of dev leads -- and while the number of females in those positions is much smaller relative to general leads, the percentage of them that are really crackerjack developers who also are very helpful is much higher.
43 - agree w/ developers, not necessarily w/ leadership roles.
what what what? yeah, i had a similar thought.
i like working with women as well, but that's 'cause i mostly work with dudes. when i mostly worked with women, i liked it when more guys joined the team. more diverse/representative employees tend to produce better functioning groups in my experiences/work.
Same here.
At a large enterprise level, IT tends to be very, very silo'ed. The dev lead I've been working with for the past 3 weeks is a female - and she readily concurs about the silo'ed nature of development. She's one of two leads on the team specifically tasked with building an API to enable to some cross-platform interactions. There are about half a dozen other development teams handling various layers of work (Content supply chain and content delivery, UI development, web services development, et al). For the past few weeks, we've been collaboratively working through problems -- a whole lot of "That's a good question", followed by she starting at one end of the whole end2end chain, me starting at the other, and we've always managed to meet up precisely where the issue lies, collectively put together the analysis for the fix, and get the issue routed to the right team.
She's out of the office today through the middle of next week -- so I've been working with her colleague, a male at the same level (another "lead"). Literally just traded IMs with him on a particularly messy issue. These are his responses, as I attempted to trace back the issue in a similar fashion to how we'd worked through problems with his currently out-of-office female colleague:
"I don't know"
"Not my problem"
"I know for certain my code is right"
"I don't care if it doesn't work - my code is correct"
I guess it's just anecdotal... so obviously, YMMV
I've been with the same company for 15 years now -- I've had 6 different bosses at various levels, 3 females, 3 males. One of the males was a dreadful disaster, another is just addled, but nice enough, I guess, while a 3rd is OK. One of the females was addled, but nice enough -- but the other two were absolutely stupendous to work for.
In fact, the last female boss I had -- she was the division "director" level -- was very much who I would consider my greatest 'mentor' professionally. She just retired this winter - but I owe a ton of my professional growth to her. She was extremely patient and helpful - and also took mentoring of her reports very seriously/put a lot of time and effort into it.
Not to resort to stereotypes or anything -- but I've noticed this paradigm seems almost universally true: The women I know and have worked for or with over the course of my career have almost all - whatever other faults or failings they may have had - be extremely good at career development/mentoring to their reports. The men tend to be noticeably worse. There are exceptions to both, I guess -- but if I were to rank the 100s of managers I know/have known well enough to make such a judgement, there's more than just statistical variance here... It's more on the order of 80%/20% great mentors on the female side, while 20%/80% good/bad ratio on the male side. I've often wondered if it's sort of a maternal instinct vs paternal instinct thing.
I guess... but the thing is - technically he's kind of right (assuming his code IS correct, and I'm not certain of that). The difference is that I've found female devs generally seem a lot better/more willing to wade outside their specific areas and assist in these sort of analyses, while the male devs seem much more likely to play turf war games/turf isolation games.
It's not altogether different from the position I'm in these days. I still watch every Angels game (for reasons that I can't quite figure out), but I don't think I could name more than two of the Pirates starting position players. I just don't really follow the rest of the league as much anymore. I live a ten minute walk from Wrigley field, and the stadium is usually full of women that could be considered "not real fans" and "just there for the beer and boys", but I'd venture to guess that 98% of them probably know a hell of a lot more about the Cubs than I do.
Party on, Garth.
Sigh. Miss her terribly.
Welcome to the 21st century mallpark.
On one memorable occasion, I got into a pretty good argument with one such sister about Cubs 3B historically... We both agreed with Santo atop the list - but had significant disagreements regarding the order of Aramis, Stan Hack, and Bill Madlock (she ranked them Hack/Madlock/A-Ram.... I put them A-Ram/Hack/Madlock). It devolved into a career vs peak discussion - and it was only about 2-3 years into A-Ram's Cub career. She accused me of lacking historical perspective -- I accused her of being old.
It really got really heated/amusing for people sitting near us when I tried to add Ron Cey's name into the mix (he was my favorite Cub growing up, even though his time was short). She said that if I was allowed to bring my boyhood crushes into the it, then she going to bring Handsome Ransom Jackson into the mix... She then also went on to say if you wanted a statue with fall-down left/fall-down right range into the mix, Andy Pafko played some 3B so he should be in the discussion, too.
At that point, I questioned whether Jesus would approve of her being so mean... which I'm pretty sure means I lost the argument.
Maybe a site without the irritating posters everybody fixates on would be better.
Sincerely, Fran (female)
To be fair, I'm pretty sure that the NSA mandates that Jim keep all the crazy uncles of the world involved and active on BBTF. Makes us much easier to track.
And, yet, true. If anything, it's more like 24 out of 25.
I love when liberals deny that water is wet.
Women in general have to like baseball too, you see, because Stereotypes are Bad, and Everyone Is The Same. (Except when we are arguing that everyone other than straight white males should get special treatment.)
Are there more women in that group than men? Who ####### cares?!?!?!?!?!? Seriously -- what does it ####### matter? If there are, what's the big deal? If there aren't, what's the big deal? Who. #######. Cares.???????
Everyone was talking about women who are attending baseball games, not women in toto.
Followed quickly by posts from Ray and SBB, and now me I guess.
This may be true. And for every 10 men at the game, 6-7 are there for beer, social interaction, and beer.
So true. In fact, it's even true of me. If I care about a game, I'd rather watch it at home. An actual ballgame usually turns into an expensive pseudo-bar trip for me, unless I'm with my very baseball-obsessed family. Then it becomes a debate on proper hand scoring.
The vast majority of woman that don't watch sports, don't watch from outside of sports stadia.
Target Field is my "home" park, as it is the park that is here where I live, and I'd say the vast majority of the people who show up there who aren't opposing team fans really don't care about the game in more than a superficial manner. The exceptions may be at the weekday day games where the upper decks are filled with the same old folks, male and female, most keeping score, who have been enjoying the Twins during the middle of the work week since they still played indoors. It's not even confined to the mallparks. Your average minor league team is promoted as "a cheap night out, and by the way, we sell alcohol." It's just easier to locate the people who know what's going on at a minor league game.
I think the author of the linked article was mushing up a lot of things that are wrong with sports culture, particularly Toronto-area sports culture, and the link between Rogers Centre being filled with dudebros and presumably offering no "text security to get drunken idiots kicked out" option and Toronto media being crappy about not finding any hardcore female fans is rather tenuous. I know I've heard Toronto fans saying they're not really wanting to bring kids to the park unless they're in the really expensive seats. That's another problem.
Actual text from my wife last week (verbatim): I found a porno video I want to show you. You'll love it. Its [sic] revolting.
Quick story: I once went to a minor league game with a big group (50 or so people) from school. The group was predominantly women (maybe 30 to 20). As luck would have it, Bryce Harper played in the game. Each time he came to bat, many or most of the guys moved to the front of the pavilion to watch him intently, talking amongst ourselves, betting on what he was going to do, etc. After this happened a time or two, the girls asked us what we were doing. None of them had heard of Bryce Harper, and most of them didn't even know that baseball had a draft. If this type of fan was so prevalent, wouldn't we expect several of the women to have heard of Bryce Harper?
It's a very, very specific Internet problem. Some women don't want to deal with sexism at all, which is the space where I was at about 7 seasons ago when I went looking for online baseball fandom. Since I was already participating in other sorts of majority-female fandoms, I found it at LiveJournal. Female science fiction nerds who like sports, you can't lose, right? Oh, you can lose. You can lose badly. Your taste in hot guys differs from the majority, or you don't have a taste for hot guys? Not good. You don't think that all male-dominated "mainstream" sports sites are evil and nasty? Not good. You think that 99% of the community is filled with potential stalkers, freaks and tinhats? Best incentive in the world to leave. (and if you go back, there is no reasoning with the girl who thinks that Drew Storen is being unfairly persecuted by the people running the Nats. There is no explanation of FIP or showing of PitchF/X data or even basic inherited runner stats that can help. Especially if she thinks it was done to break up Storen and Clippard as a couple.)
Post more, please.
This probably kills my ultra-liberal cred, but the thought of a woman who wanted to go to 16 baseball games in 16 days is not particularly appealing to me. Tolerating baseball is probably required; actually enjoying it is great; but I don't necessarily know that I either need or want to be discussing Lucas Duda's subpar dWAR numbers with my sexual partner. I'm not saying it's a turn off, but it isn't a turn on. Not that this makes it any more right, but I'm quite confident this works both ways: I think a lot of women would be rather unexcited by a straight man who wanted to watch Project Runway for hours a day.
The overall issue reminds me quite a bit of the "fake geek girl" thing going on videogame and comics fandom (given the demographics here, I'm sure I didn't have to explain that to most of you ;) Now that has become far more virulent (people reporting feminist videogame pieces as "spam" to Youtube and getting them taken off the site, sending death threats, stuff like that), because the typical videogamer especially is much younger¹ than the typical baseball fan. But it's pretty much the same exact basic idea. I really have no clue what to say about it. I don't know how I'm supposed to make someone empathize when they're philosophically opposed to the very idea of empathy.
¹ And, to be fair to the yobbos above, because there probably legitimately is a lower percentage of hardcore female baseball fans than hardcore female videogamers. I dunno about comics.
If you're "looking for a partner" you've already done it wrong. Live. Authentically and vigorously. Friends, lovers, partners and enemies will fall into place along the way.
You forgot to add "post a lot on the internet."
It's true for me, too. Baseball will never die because it is played outside in the summertime, and they sell beer.
The number 1 place where marriages gestate in American society.
I go to a few games per year, because a early summer or fall evening* at the ball park is just wonderful. But I really don't like the other fans very much.
*day games in Atlanta are non-pleasant experiences in the majority of the baseball season...
Dave Dombrowski and Jim Leyland would like you to get in touch...
the ballpark is where a baseball game happens, but like, so what
there are PLENTY of serious hardcore female baseball fans who go to games - check the chicks with the scorebooks
and got news for you - a very significant number of men are very uncomfortable (using that word to be nice) when talking to a female who can talk stats and talk history.
- as for a partner, well, my mama made the mistake of marrying a man who hates sports - she didn't think it would matter. he didn't think any grrl REALLY cared about sports so it wouldn't matter
so i made sure that at least my Husband didn't HATE baseball. or at least is an oscar winning actor about it
and bradley awesomeness is still TEH HOTTTTTTTTT
along with matt kemp and adam jones
My fiancee and I share similar TV/movie interests in many cases, but she's not much of a "scoreball" fan (as she calls all sports). However, she doesn't mind when I have the TV on to a sports game (and she did even go to a Red Sox game with me last year).
I once was part of a team that won a golf "scramble" charity event, and the prize was 2 plane tickets anywhere in the continental U.S. and free rental car for a week to boot.
I was on, er, rather friendly terms with a woman who was quite obsessed with the Yankees (although I met her at Murphy's Bleachers outside of Wrigley Field). So I decided to take her to spring training in Ft Lauderdale for a week in March (back before the Yankees moved spring training to Tampa).
I showed her the schedule on the week-long homestand and asked which games she'd like to attend. Her answer: "All of them, of course."
Turned out quite well, with a nice mix of day and night games.
Then again, I later married a woman who would check off the "Yankees fan" box as well - but who hasn't watched 2 innings of Yankees baseball in 10 years and couldn't name a single player on my Rotisserie League team. Hell, I'll bet she couldn't even tell you my TEAM name - which is fine with both of us.
Spring Training Girl, by the way, got married to someone else a few years later - at Yankee Stadium, even though she lives at least 700 miles away.
He wasn't a baseball fan.
The marriage, needless to say, didn't take.
Hmm, I should probably have an auction here, with the winner getting her email address. She used to get the "You look just like a younger Shelley Long" comment from strangers back in the day.
I like that we have some very different interests. We both highly value that there are a bunch of aspects of our lives that aren't both of ours.
I think that sums up precisely why I find this site so valuable. Because everyone here is here for baseball, we're a pretty diverse crowd politically and philosophically.
It's an unfortunate thing that the anonymity or relative anonymity of the internet brings out some of the vilest aspects of human nature, because it also brings such a valuable thing to the table. We reveal only those parts of ourselves that we choose to share, forcing others to engage us without the preconceptions the rest of the world has. I honestly believe that the internet is the key to bringing down many of our social barriers. I don't know that I could have been as readily convinced of the social concept of privilege in a physical space.
Maybe, but it's hard to play 17th century ceremonial music without it.
My GF and I went with another couple to a game a few weeks back. He and I hurried to our seats to catch the first pitch; the GF and his wife hung out in the food area, eating and talking, until about the third inning. They eventually came down, and seemed to have a good time, but I think they'd have been just as happy going out to dinner at a place that wasn't a baseball park.
It's fine. She likes those shows about the various iterations of Kardashians, which I can't watch for more than 30 seconds without rolling my eyes so violently that I'm in danger of suffering a stroke. But I'll sit and watch them with her, and she'll go to baseball games with me (both things happening only on occasion).
(But put me in the camp who recognizes there are certainly die-hard baseball fans out there. I got my fandom from my mother, who got it from her mother, who went to her grave bemoaning the Cubs' inability to find a halfway decent middle reliever. My sister was a Cub fan as well, though it was more along the lines of "Mark Grace is a dreamboat" kind of fandom. Once he moved on to Arizona, she more or less lost interest.
My friend refers to his mother as a "Gammons savant" because she'll randomly toss out insightful or insider comments about the Red Sox while they're on the phone, despite being relatively ditzy in the other aspects of her life.)
"I got my fandom from my mother,"
My mother's favorite team was whomever the Yankees played that night.
A couple of foot stomps from upstairs from her 100-pound frame while watching her black-and-white tiny TV screen on pre-cable TV told us that surely an opposing batter had homered.
It must seem hard for young BBTFers to believe, then, that I am younger than our current President.
:)
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main