User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.3157 seconds
48 querie(s) executed
| ||||||||
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Discussion
| ||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Wednesday, November 25, 2020What happened to Andrew Benintendi? And can he rebound from it?
RoyalsRetro (AG#1F)
Posted: November 25, 2020 at 06:03 PM | 13 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags: andrew benintendi, red sox |
Login to submit news.
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: Albert Pujols could keep playing to reach 700 career homers: 'If I’m close to it, why not?'
(154 - 9:29pm, Mar 06) Last: Howie Menckel Newsblog: We found them: They're the worst team ever (1 - 9:20pm, Mar 06) Last: John Northey Newsblog: Jake Odorizzi reaches 2-year deal with Houston Astros, source says (6 - 9:10pm, Mar 06) Last: DCA Newsblog: MLB suspends free agent Sam Dyson for entire 2021 season (7 - 8:55pm, Mar 06) Last: Mayor Blomberg Newsblog: Universal DH and expanded postseason unlikely for 2021 MLB season, per report (33 - 5:49pm, Mar 06) Last: ERROR---Jolly Old St. Nick Newsblog: OT - Soccer Thread - Winter Is Here (903 - 2:42pm, Mar 06) Last: AuntBea odeurs de parfum de distance sociale Newsblog: NBA 2020 Season kick-off thread (1913 - 1:49pm, Mar 06) Last: ramifications of an exciting 57i66135 Newsblog: Source: Former Boston Red Sox CF Jackie Bradley Jr. to sign 2-year, $24M deal with Milwaukee Brewers (28 - 11:58am, Mar 06) Last: snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Sox Therapy: A Week Without Me (2 - 11:22am, Mar 06) Last: jacksone (AKA It's OK...) Newsblog: Braves revenue fell by almost $300 million last year (42 - 11:47pm, Mar 05) Last: Joyful Calculus Instructor Newsblog: Empty Stadium Sports Will Be Really Weird (12233 - 11:13pm, Mar 05) Last: Joyful Calculus Instructor Newsblog: Primer Dugout (and link of the day) 3-5-2021 (9 - 7:47pm, Mar 05) Last: puck Newsblog: Trevor Story Rumors: Rockies Contract Extension Won't Happen 'Anytime Soon' (17 - 12:38pm, Mar 05) Last: Bourbon Samurai stays in the fight Newsblog: Joe Altobelli dies: Rochester's 'Mr. Baseball' led Orioles to last title (14 - 9:49am, Mar 05) Last: ERROR---Jolly Old St. Nick Newsblog: New report alleges Terry Francona, Chris Antonetti knew about Mickey Callaway’s behavior (50 - 9:12am, Mar 05) Last: Jobu is silent on the changeup |
|||||||
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2021 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.3157 seconds |
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Walt Davis Posted: November 25, 2020 at 11:46 PM (#5991225)As to the scouts -- looks like a case where they fell in love a bit too much with the potential over the performance. Not that the Red Sox gave them much opportunity to judge the performance. He did well in 2015 and well in A+ and AA in 2016 ... but not superstar amazing. Maybe he could have used another year in the minors but he was up for good in 2016. His 2016 MLB #s nearly match his 2016 AA numbers which, in retrospect, was probably a bit of over-performance. Still just 22 entering 2017, certainly he had the track record of a guy who'd be a good player but Trout, Betts, "80 hitter", "multiple batting titles" ... that's hard to see.
Here's a comparison of Benintendi and Hosmer by age (somebody can track down PFs if they want)
AB 20 313/416/556 A-/A
EH 20 338/406/571 A+/AA
AB 21 312/378/532 A+/AA
EH 21 439/525/582 AAA
AB 21 295/359/476, 118 OPS+ MLB
EH 21 293/334/465, 118 OPS+ MLB
AB 22-24 276/354/440, 108 OPS+, 7.9 oWAR
EH 22-24 270/327/404, 100 OPS+, 3.8 oWAR
So a sizable oWAR difference for ages 22-24 -- mainly because Hosmer was terrible at age 22. Otherwise, that's pretty similar with Hosmer being a year ahead in development at 21. Based on that age 20-21, I thought Hosmer was gonna be damn good, at least a line-drive BA and doubles hitter so I understand the enthusiasm on Benintendi. But Hosmer was drafted a year before Trout, 2 before Harper and 3 before Betts so we didn't know yet but by the time AB was drafted, Trout was well on his way to 36 WAR in 4 years and scouts should have learned not to utter his name next to anyone else's unless there was a "I'm not saying he's" before Trout.
Which is fine, as far as it goes. But in 2013, Benintendi put up 4.1 WAR at age 23. He was a good to very good player with a chance to move up into All-Star status. His results since then have just been awful, comparatively. An injury makes sense, I guess. His age 23 and his scouting and results before that were a fluke? I guess it's possible. Overall, though, just a surprising result for a guy who looked like a really good, maybe excellent, player, just a couple years ago.
Surprising yes, but certainly not unprecedented.
What I'm saying is that his results before that did not support the conclusion that he would be an elite player. They were certainly solid -- and those guys sometimes become elite players -- but not spectacular. 2020 obviously was an unmitigated disaster that was not predictable -- like the rest of the world -- but his age 24 is well in line with 21 and 22. His Rbats
21: +2 in 118 PA
22: -1 in 658 PA
23: +18 in 661 PA
24: 0 in 615 PA
That's a pretty common set of outcomes for somebody who is say a "true" 110 OPS+ hitter. Beyond that we're into peripheral stuff where he helps his case with slightly positive baserunning and being an above-average OF. That's a solid, better than average, starting MLB player. With potential to be better? Sure.
Nick Markakis seems like another reasonable comp as to the type of player that Benintendi reasonbly could have become. And by WAR, starting at age 22: 2.5, 4.2, 7.4 (ooh boy) ... 2.9, 2.3, 2.7 ... then nothing above 2 until 2.7 at age 34.
He could of course just as easily turn out to be ... Michael Brantley who didn't break out until 25 but, when healthy, has been a 4 WAR player for the last 9 years. It's certainly fair to say that nobody would have been surprised if Benintendi had carried on being a 4-WAR player from 24 into his early 30s -- that would be a very nice player (Brantley) but not a star, clearly not a "once in a decade hitter." Equally though, nobody should have been surprised that age 24 looked more like age 22 than age 23 -- that happens all the time.
None of that is a dig at Benintendi. It is a dig at the quoted scouts. C'mon, we've seen a good number of "once in a decade hitters" over the last few decades -- Bonds, Pujols, Miggy, Trout -- there was never anything in Benintendi's results that suggested such heights. (Not that such heights are predictable.) And the guy's only listed at 5'9, 180 -- so, at best, Mookie minus nearly all the speed and defense? Where's the massive power gonna come from (even Mookie's career high is just 32 HR)? When the scout said "once a decade hitter" did he mean Tony Gwynn?
He was only a 31st round pick out of HS and that by his hometown team. He was the 7th overall pick later, 2 behind Kyle Tucker, 2 ahead of Ian Happ. Seems most folks had him pegged about right at the time. And, to date, he's the 2nd best player taken in the 1st round that year. He's already tied for the 13th-best #7 pick of all-time (with the "disappointing" Matt Harvey). That's all very solid.
On that 7th pick list, he's just a few spots behind Austin Kearns, another guy I thought was gonna be a darn good player. Kearns hit the groud running with a 134 OPS+ and 4 WAR in just 435 PA at 22. He followed that with 1.4 WAR in a half-season. But over the next 4 seasons, with some injuries, just a 105 OPS+ though still around a 3 WAR pace. Then he collapsed with -1.2 WAR over parts of the next 6 seasons.
Moncada and Benintendi are the same age and both had a taste of MLB in 2016, Moncada got less playing time in 2017. His OPS+s have ranged 103, 96, 140 and 94 in 2020 and he's totaled about 8 WAR at a 3 WAR/650 pace. Benintendi about 10 WAR at a 3 WAR pace. Torres is 2 years younger, has been the better hitter to date and has about 6.5 WAR at a 3.4 WAR pace. So that all looks about right. Of the 3, Torres has made 2 AS games; AB finished 2nd and Torres 3rd in their RoY years; Torres and Moncada have received very down-ballot MVP votes. So that all sounds about right and none of these guys have broekn through to "star" yet (Torres maybe) but all three have had at least one very good season and could become stars. So were we expecting Benintendi to mop the floor with Moncada and Torres or did we have 3 once-in-a-decade hitters at the same time and are disappointed in all 3?
A solid player, but not one you build a franchise around. And wait for it...
Now if only the Sox had come across one of those "build a franchise around guys" recently?
- He was a highly-regarded prospect and draft pick, but it was because of his ceiling, and more because of his floor. He was one of those rare guys who came touted as "ready to hit in the bigs" from almost day one. It is not that his upside was a franchise player; it was that his floor was an above-average hitter and solid glove and baserunner. Sort of like a poor man's John Olerud, but an outfielder, rather than a first baseman; or a Mike Greenwell (although for a few years Greenwell was better than anybody thought he would turn out).
- The 2020 season will likely not be a good barometer of a lot of things in the sports world. One of the best things that happened for MLB was that the Dodgers won the World Series, because it allowed the sport to say that the entire process was legitimate - the best team won the whole thing. When it looked like the Astros might get to the World Series with a sub-.500 record, the risk of discounting the whole season because "it just didn't matter" was heightened.
As a tangent, I think the two biggest threats major league baseball faces in the coming years are:
1) The painfully slow pace of play; and
2) The growing perception that the season doesn't matter a whole lot - that 162 games is too many; that the relative importance of each game is too low; that it is not a great sport for casual gambling. If the sport is committed to further expanding the playoffs, then it really needs to think about shortening the season.
Generally speaking, if the NFL and NBA are looking at some innovation relating to making its sports more TV-friendly, digital-friendly, casual betting-friendly, and media-friendly, then MLB should be thinking hard about it, too. The NBA and NFL are the dominant sports of American culture. In terms of the NFL, what it has done to crush TV and casual gambling is nothing short of remarkable. In terms of the NBA, what it is has done over the past ~40 years is equally remarkable. In 1981, 4 of the 6 NBA finals games were on via tape-delay, and baseball was in a much more commanding position culturally. To go from that point to where the most famous athletes in the country are either NFL QBs, or NBA basketball players, is also remarkable.
Part of why stories like, "Is this 14-game stretch where Benintendi sucked a sign that he now sucks?!" are written is because our culture, economy, and media are focused on storylines that are about short attention spans and time horizons. Mike Trout's greatness is not fully appreciated on a night-to-night basis; it is appreciated over years of consistent excellence. In the NFL and NBA, there are moments every night that a casual sports fan can say, "Wow, break-your-ankles fake/drive to the hoop/tomahawk slam is crazy!". Mookie might be the closest thing in baseball today to a guy that can generate that kind of "Wow!". I thought Bryce Harper could be a guy like that, but it hasn't happened.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main