User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.4656 seconds
58 querie(s) executed
You are here > Home > Transaction Oracle > Discussion
| ||||||||
Transaction Oracle — A Timely Look at Transactions as They Happen Saturday, December 15, 20072008 ZiPS Projections - Colorado RockiesWorld Series appearance or not, I believe it’s more accurate to call the Rockies a good team rather than one of the elite teams in the NL. Why were they good in 2007? Despite the flowery summations over hunger and scrappiness and so forth, the Rockies success was essentially based on two things:
1) Dan O’Dowd finally abandoning the notion of trying to find a gimmicky team to win in Coors and simply assembling a team of the best players he could find. Coors Field is less of a hitter’s park than it used to be, but it’s still a very strong hitter’s park, just not the best hitter’s park in MLB history by a substantial margin, as it was in the earlier days. OK, Mile High was just as bad, but I think people reading can get the gist - Mile High and Coors were massive hitter’s parks for similar reasons. This Rockies team was made to win in every stadium they played in, not simply 1 of the 30 parks.
2) The front-line hitters were very good and, quite importantly, very healthy. The Big 5 of Helton, Atkins, Hawpe, Tulowitzki, and Holliday combined for an OPS+ of 126 and Hawpe missed the most games, with 11. Just for reference, Johnny Bench’s average OPS+ was 126, so more likely than not, any pitcher facing the Rockies was essentially facing 5 Johnny Benches. When you’re down in a game, a quintet of Benches is a great thing to have, especially when your playoff opponent decides that Jose Mesa appearing in a must-win game is a good idea.
Now, it’s probably greedy to expect the Rockies to get to the Series again in 2008, but it’s certainly possible. I think it’ll be a hard road in 2008. I think relative to the AL, the NL will be closer than it has in recent years because with the league looking a bit on the weak side, it just seems like more NL teams are trying to be aggressive at improving their teams, thinking that it’s a good opportunity with the league on the weak side. Except for the Marlins, of course.
Projections Projections Projections Projections Projections Projections Projections Projections Projections Projections Projections Projections Projections Projections Projections Projections Projections Projections Projections Projections Dan Szymborski
Posted: December 15, 2007 at 08:14 PM | 24 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Related News: |
BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot Topics2012 ZiPS Projections, Final Edition
(23 - 11:21am, May 31) Last: craigsaboe 2012 ZiPS/RBI Baseball (20 - 10:58am, May 03) Last: tjans 2012 ZiPS Projections Spreadsheets, v. 1 (62 - 4:38pm, Apr 10) Last: nemodomi 2012 ZiPS Projections - Oakland A's (69 - 5:57am, Apr 10) Last: Athletic Supporter's aunt's sorry like Aziz 2012 ZiPS Projections - Kansas City Royals (31 - 1:51pm, Mar 23) Last: hokieneer Pirates - Acquire Burnett (10 - 11:09pm, Feb 20) Last: You Know Nothing JT Snow (YR) 2012 ZiPS Projections - Pittsburgh Pirates (41 - 10:02am, Feb 20) Last: Dangerous Dean 2012 ZiPS Projections - Minnesota Twins (31 - 8:53pm, Feb 17) Last: A Random 8-Year-Old Eskimo 2012 ZiPS Projections - Boston Red Sox (46 - 4:41pm, Feb 17) Last: Jose is an Absurd Sultan 2012 ZiPS Projections - San Diego Padres (29 - 2:33pm, Feb 17) Last: Dan Szymborski 2012 ZiPS Projections - Arizona Diamondbacks (31 - 2:03am, Feb 14) Last: Dan Szymborski 2012 ZiPS Projections - Texas Rangers (21 - 12:43pm, Feb 10) Last: DEF: selfish min-maxer 2012 ZiPS Projections - Miami Marlins (31 - 8:16pm, Feb 07) Last: Misirlou cut his hair and moved to Rome 2012 ZiPS Projections - Cleveland Indians (19 - 10:18pm, Feb 02) Last: DevinM 2012 ZiPS Projections - Atlanta Braves (28 - 6:25pm, Jan 31) Last: Spahn Insane |
|||||||
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2021 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.4656 seconds |
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: December 15, 2007 at 09:03 PM (#2646775)I thought they induced the most groundballs of any team in baseball this year. Wasn't that by design, to find groundball pitchers?
The pitchers do seem a bit high to me. Jeff Francis has easily beaten that projection each of the past two years, is 27, and is healthy. Manny Corpas is projected to have the worst season of his career at the age of 25. Aaron Cook is projected to have his highest ERA since 2003. And so on.
Including minor leagues, Corpas has just 225 IP the last 3 seasons. Typical or better for a reliever but still a small sample size and any such track record needs to be regressed pretty heavily. Also, he has 179 Ks in those IP which is not that special for a reliever. And his career minor-league WHIP is 1.33, career major-league WHIP 1.15. That said, the projected HR rate seems high and the Ks a little low.
But mainly I go with the IP thing. Over the last three years, 1.5 in the minors, Corpas has compiled the track record of one good starting season. That's very little to go on.
I guess my question is, what would an ERA projection of say 4.50 be in your average NL park? AL park?
Three-year weighted, I have the Coors overall run factor as 116, so take off 8% or so.
By these projections, the Rockies have pretty good depth at the corners (Smith, Spilborghs, Koshansky) so they may be reasonably able to withstand some injuries to their top hitters. The main question marks are the same ones they had last season -- C, 2B, CF.
SP depth also seems reasonable (and didn't they just sign Kip Wells? why? not a bad gamble but this doesn't seem the team that needs a 5th starter).
I'll grant this team projects at least a little better than I gave them credit for in some recent thread. But I'm guessing it's still around a mid-80s team in terms of true talent and it will take some luck to make the playoffs. (Note, not sure any NL team much less NL West team projects substantially better.)
I don't have any idea what they're going to do at second. At this point, they might just as well have hung on to Jamey Carroll, who was OK there in 2006.
Three-year weighted, I have the Coors overall run factor as 116, so take off 8% or so.
Many thanks Dan!
He signed with the Padres.
The Rockies were second in the majors in GB%, to Toronto.
Corpas has, to this point in his major league career, allowed twice as many GBs as FBs - but that's only based on 322 total batted balls.
Ubaldo Jimenez was not terrible at Colorado Springs. He really only had three bad starts out of 19. One thing that you have to be careful about in looking at minor league pitchers, especially starters, is the distribution of runs across games. There will be any number of times in which a pitcher in the minors will be left on the mound to absorb a pounding where in the majors he'd be taken out of the game, because the focus in the minors is less on winning and more on development and the major league teams want the pitchers to get their work. Jimenez, for example, gave up 9 ER in 2 2/3 innings in his first start, 7 ER in 3 2/3 innings in his third start, and eight ER in 3 2/3 innings on June 7. He posted a 4.16 ERA in his other 16 starts, which is a very good ERA for Colorado Springs.
-- MWE
But you can play this game with most pitchers. He did have plenty of other bad starts - just look at some of his walk totals.
Ubaldo and Morales frustrated the folks here in Tulsa by insisting on tickling the radar guns vs. throwing strikes. Ubaldo can be a top-flight starter, and Morales isn't far behind, but they'll need to show they can unlearn the "throw it harder" mentality.
Vizcaino is a great addition to the bullpen.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main