User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 1.2409 seconds
55 querie(s) executed
You are here > Home > Transaction Oracle > Discussion
| ||||||||
Transaction Oracle — A Timely Look at Transactions as They Happen Sunday, December 04, 2011Angels - Acquire Brad MillsLos Angeles Angels: Acquired LHP Brad Mills from Toronto for C Jeff Mathis. Well. It’s the only way I can think of to keep Mike Scioscia from playing Mathis more than his talents objectively merit. Unless of course the move means that Scioscia (who—fair or not—is often viewed as the de facto GM of the Angels) has reconsidered Mathis’ actual value. Mathis won’t play much in Toronto. He’s arbitration eligible and I doubt the Blue Jays fear going to arbitration with him. The only problem from their point of view is that every player you can attempt to compare Mathis to is likely to be a better player. The way that tends to work if it actually goes to arbitration is that the player gets a little less than a much better player and thus ends up being overpaid. See for instance Brian Hunter and the Mariners a few years back. He’s obviously a candidate to be non-tendered, but I suspect the Jays actually want him as their backup and thus will negotiate with him and then perhaps actually go the arbitration route. And they won’t be broken up if their plans don’t work out. Mills is sort of interesting. His stats at the major league level are awful. Mostly because he can’t command the strike zone and doesn’t have the stuff to deal with pitching behind in the count. But his stats at AAA are not bad. They don’t blow you away, but over a 3 year stretch he’s put up a 4.32 ERA in Las Vegas—a really good place to hit. What’s more, his control has progressively improved down there. The strikeout rate is not a positive (not a problem either), but I’ve seen plenty of pitchers with worse numbers become serviceable major league starters. He’s very unlikely to be anything more than back of the rotation filler, but that’s a tremendous haul for a backup catcher that your manager has fallen in love with. To be clear, I think it far more likely that Mills sticks around as a number two lefty out of the pen, but he does have a shot, while Mathis is pretty much the punch line to Casey Stengel’s old joke about Greg Goosen. |
BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot Topics2012 ZiPS Projections, Final Edition
(23 - 11:21am, May 31) Last: craigsaboe 2012 ZiPS/RBI Baseball (20 - 10:58am, May 03) Last: tjans 2012 ZiPS Projections Spreadsheets, v. 1 (62 - 4:38pm, Apr 10) Last: nemodomi 2012 ZiPS Projections - Oakland A's (69 - 5:57am, Apr 10) Last: Athletic Supporter is USDA certified lean 2012 ZiPS Projections - Kansas City Royals (31 - 1:51pm, Mar 23) Last: hokieneer Pirates - Acquire Burnett (10 - 11:09pm, Feb 20) Last: You Know Nothing JT Snow (YR) 2012 ZiPS Projections - Pittsburgh Pirates (41 - 10:02am, Feb 20) Last: Dangerous Dean 2012 ZiPS Projections - Minnesota Twins (31 - 8:53pm, Feb 17) Last: A Random 8-Year-Old Eskimo 2012 ZiPS Projections - Boston Red Sox (46 - 4:41pm, Feb 17) Last: Jose is an Absurd Sultan 2012 ZiPS Projections - San Diego Padres (29 - 2:33pm, Feb 17) Last: Dan Szymborski 2012 ZiPS Projections - Arizona Diamondbacks (31 - 2:03am, Feb 14) Last: Dan Szymborski 2012 ZiPS Projections - Texas Rangers (21 - 12:43pm, Feb 10) Last: DEF: selfish min-maxer 2012 ZiPS Projections - Miami Marlins (31 - 8:16pm, Feb 07) Last: Misirlou cut his hair and moved to Rome 2012 ZiPS Projections - Cleveland Indians (19 - 10:18pm, Feb 02) Last: DevinM 2012 ZiPS Projections - Atlanta Braves (28 - 6:25pm, Jan 31) Last: Spahn Insane |
|||||||
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2021 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 1.2409 seconds |
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Walt Davis Posted: December 04, 2011 at 06:20 PM (#4006604)I assume what the Jays are doing is negotiating with him in the pre-tender window, hoping he will agree to be non-tendered then signed at something less than $1 M. If the Jays want to pay Mathis $1.7 M or more to be their backup C, that's not too smart.
My assumption exactly.
And to more or less second #5 I don't think the Jays would be too broken up about paying him that for a year -- not that it would surprise me if they negotiated and then non-tendered him.
As I said, the issue would seem to be who you can use as a comp. Bill Bergen made $2,700 in 1902 (at 24) but there was something of a salary explosion at the time. He probably made less a few years later -- when you can better use him as a comp for Mathis (since it's one of the few he'll win)
Heck, we could get Tony Womack for that kind of money!
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main