User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.6569 seconds
57 querie(s) executed
You are here > Home > Transaction Oracle > Discussion
| ||||||||
Transaction Oracle — A Timely Look at Transactions as They Happen Wednesday, December 08, 2010Royals - Signed FrenchyKansas City Royals - Signed OF Jeff Francoeur to a 1-year contract with a 2012 option.
The nicest thing I can say about this signing is that, if used correctly, Jeff Francoeur isn’t the worst signing in the world. However, given the record of Kansas City being completely unable to use any part-timer correctly, I don’t expect Frenchy to be the abberation - the team has simply been unable to identify which players help the team’s record and which players don’t. Yes, Frenchy can hit lefties somewhat, but so can pretty much any right-handed fringe player with some power and Delta Man is no Matt Diaz or Ron Coomer, either in southpaw slaughtering or willingness to accept a limited role.
Dan Szymborski
Posted: December 08, 2010 at 06:03 PM | 48 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Related News: |
BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot Topics2012 ZiPS Projections, Final Edition
(23 - 11:21am, May 31) Last: craigsaboe 2012 ZiPS/RBI Baseball (20 - 10:58am, May 03) Last: tjans 2012 ZiPS Projections Spreadsheets, v. 1 (62 - 4:38pm, Apr 10) Last: nemodomi 2012 ZiPS Projections - Oakland A's (69 - 5:57am, Apr 10) Last: Athletic Supporter is USDA certified lean 2012 ZiPS Projections - Kansas City Royals (31 - 1:51pm, Mar 23) Last: hokieneer Pirates - Acquire Burnett (10 - 11:09pm, Feb 20) Last: You Know Nothing JT Snow (YR) 2012 ZiPS Projections - Pittsburgh Pirates (41 - 10:02am, Feb 20) Last: Dangerous Dean 2012 ZiPS Projections - Minnesota Twins (31 - 8:53pm, Feb 17) Last: A Random 8-Year-Old Eskimo 2012 ZiPS Projections - Boston Red Sox (46 - 4:41pm, Feb 17) Last: Jose is an Absurd Sultan 2012 ZiPS Projections - San Diego Padres (29 - 2:33pm, Feb 17) Last: Dan Szymborski 2012 ZiPS Projections - Arizona Diamondbacks (31 - 2:03am, Feb 14) Last: Dan Szymborski 2012 ZiPS Projections - Texas Rangers (21 - 12:43pm, Feb 10) Last: DEF: selfish min-maxer 2012 ZiPS Projections - Miami Marlins (31 - 8:16pm, Feb 07) Last: Misirlou cut his hair and moved to Rome 2012 ZiPS Projections - Cleveland Indians (19 - 10:18pm, Feb 02) Last: DevinM 2012 ZiPS Projections - Atlanta Braves (28 - 6:25pm, Jan 31) Last: Spahn Insane |
|||||||
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2021 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.6569 seconds |
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Rays&Sox; Posted: December 08, 2010 at 06:19 PM (#3705805)He only played in 25 big-league games, yes.
Who are today's AAAA lifers who can't get a break?
Kila Kaaihue, for one.
What about Roger Dorn? Where did he land after that magical run in Cleveland?
Mitch Jones and John Lindsey are both kicking around.
Amazingly, no, I have never seen Major League 2.
You might want to consider prefacing future comments with "SPOILER ALERT".
:-P
John Bowker is about 50 more bad big-league AB from joining the club.
I'm not saying they SHOULD have made him an offer, I'm just a little surprised, I guess.
Nelson Cruz *was* a KPASTer a few years ago, whereas Jones and Lindsey are just good minor leaguers.
I remember Pedro Swann - he never struck me as more than a good minor leaguer.
Who are today's AAAA lifers who can't get a break?
(Some of these have gotten small breaks but failed ... of course, that's how these things go by definition.)
The two that pop out at me (offhand) are:
Winston Abreu. Big league stuff, big league stats. Just signed w/ TOR for next year.
Mike Hessman - batting average is terrible, but plus power, draws walks, and became a pretty good defender at third. Became a good player at roughly the same point he stopped being a prospect (was a first baseman with Atlanta). At peak, was likely above major league average - definitely past peak now. May go to Japan.
Qo'noS.
It was his sled.
I don't know, likely only 2007/08 when he hit 254/.356/.540/and .271/.374/.602 in the IL, he's got 4000 PAs in AAA and he's hit .241/.329/.492 which likely works out to an MLE of .215/.300/.430
bleeeech
I got a couple of friends really mad at me one time for saying that. I haven't even seen the stinking movie.
It does completely ruin the movie.
No it doesn't, it works perfectly fine as a McGuffin whether you know who/what Rosebud is or not, knowing it ahead of time simply spoils the ending as a sight gag.
> I got a couple of friends really mad at me one time for saying that. I haven't even seen the stinking movie.
It does completely ruin the movie.
I don't think the sled is as big a deal as Roger Dorn turning out to be a woman. THAT threw me. I had to go back and watch ML2 twice to work it out.
I will say this -- he has a lot of situational value to a Royals team that could use a right handed right fielder who'll sign a cheap, short term contract. It's not enough to turn a bad player into a good player, but the Royals had a big Frenchy-shaped hole in the roster. Better this than signing a better yet mediocre player for a lot more money and a lot more years.
He signed a two-year deal with Hanshin before last year. So he's got one more.
There. That should ruin The Wizard of Oz about as much as knowing what Rosebud is ruins Citizen Kane. Both reveals are completely irrelevant to your enjoyment of those movies. (Plus not everyone agrees on the meaning of the Rosebud reveal. Is he longing for his lost childhood? Is that his version of saying "Mommy"? Is he saying that he always cared more about things than people? Is his last thought not all that coherent?) Edit: Basically what Crispix said.
Billy is awesome as usual. I particularly like Dayton Moore's ROFLing his money away.
Completely ruin is probably a tad strong but that little kick at the end made me enjoy the movie a lot more.
Sure there are, but I think 0.01% is ridiculously low-balling it. You're talking about extreme surprises. These movies are structured so that these revelations inflict the greatest possible amount of "Holy ####\" on the audience. The surprises are not just irrelevant tangents.
I first saw CK with sled foreknowledge, and the reveal was uninteresting to me because of it. Welles may have considered the sled trick to be "tawdry" (as per Wikipedia), but he had final say on the script, direction, editing etc and he put it in the movie. It's there for a reason. And any virgin viewer, no matter how much they've been tutored on noticing the groundbreaking cinematography (or whatever), will be damn excited when the reveal occurs, because the plot demands it.
I can testify that seeing Rosebud on an unspoiled viewing is a "Holy ####!" moment. But on a second viewing, it doesn't tell you much. It doesn't change the meaning of the preceding story, it doesn't develop a theme (we already know Kane lost everything he loved), it doesn't explain who Kane was, hell, it doesn't even give a clear impression of what Kane was thinking when he said it. It's an enigma punctuating a life of enigmas. The weight you attach to the reveal depends on how much you value a virgin viewing experience versus repeated watchings and analysis.
And if you believe the William Randolph Hearst=Charles Foster Kane theories, consider this: "Rosebud" was Hearst's nickname for his mistress's clitoris. Maybe all old Kane wanted was a lemon party. (Look, if I have to have that image in my head, I don't want to suffer alone.)
Knowing that after fact, or rumor (to be fair), made watching Citizen Kane much more interesting. It's the equivalent of your last words being poontang (which they may well be).
His (Hessman's) AAA zMLEs for 2002-2009* have him at .233/.312/.459 (in an aggregated slight pitcher's park). Add plus defense at that's solid, though certainly not world beater, production.
(By year: '02: .249/.306/.467, '03: .242/.290/.440, '04: .261/.337/.511, '05: .214/.292/.382, '06: .220/.295/.451, '07: .248/.331/.511, '08: .263/.350/.572, '09: .203/.295/.385)
* omitting 2010 as it's not in my source file, not trying to use selective endpoints. If I were, I'd probably omit the Richmond experience entirely.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main