Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
It should definitely be a lot of fun. I have found that line of criticism to be nonsense. Beyond the whole "beat who gets put in front of you" idea that fact is that winning 87% of the time against ANY competition is good. If the Sox were to do that to Baltimore and Tampa only as the season went on they would go 33-5. Playing .500 ball against everyone else would still get them to 95 wins.
Tonight should be great. I'm going to try to stay up for it. I can't wait to see Ohtani and of course the Sox have been appointment viewing so far and in my opinion should continue to be. This is a good team.
There were a lot of things I expected to see last night, that was not one of them.
3. villageidiom
Posted: April 18, 2018 at 10:33 AM (#5655856)
There were a lot of things I expected to see last night, that was not one of them.
Likewise. I mean, blisters happen, and it's hard for a pitcher to maintain command of his pitches when dealing with them. In retrospect it all makes sense. But I did not expect a one-sided home run derby to break out - and if I had, I wouldn't have expected the one side to be Boston.
Going into the series I took my usual stance for a west coast swing with evenly-matched teams: I expect Boston to take 1 of 3, and anything better than that is a bonus. Winning the first game puts them in a great position. I don't expect the next couple of games to be anything like last night - except maybe the Rodriguez game if the scores are reversed, because running up an absurd pitch count quickly is kinda his thing. But taking game 1 is awesome.
4. BDC
Posted: April 18, 2018 at 11:31 AM (#5655895)
To the main question, though, no, they are an imaginary team from a Disney movie, much like the Mighty Ducks.
5. villageidiom
Posted: April 19, 2018 at 09:56 AM (#5656382)
As I indicated in #3 I didn't expect last night's result, either.
I'm surprised they didn't start selling Red Sox logoed balaclavas at Fenway. Missed opportunity.
9. Bad Fish
Posted: April 19, 2018 at 09:38 PM (#5656852)
Their record is cartoonish, and it will come back down to earth. That said, a lot of winning streaks start take on a desperate, augered out stench in the late stages and I don't get that feeling with this streak, it feels pretty organic. I guess when you combine good hitting with good pitching good things happen.
10. villageidiom
Posted: April 19, 2018 at 11:29 PM (#5656910)
And good defense, BF. Whatever information they have tucked away on laminated index cards under their caps, it seems to be helping.
16-2. They could play .500 for the rest of the year and finish 88-74, probably earning a Wild Card berth. Obviously they want a third straight division title and .500 the rest of the way would be a bummer but that just highlights the impact this has. They haven't won anything yet of course but they've bought themselves some wiggle room for the inevitable slump.
12. villageidiom
Posted: April 20, 2018 at 09:31 AM (#5656977)
The 1998 Yankees were 61-20 in the first half. Boston would match that if they go 45-18 from here on out. This is just to say that the 1998 Yankees had an insane first half.
13. SoSH U at work
Posted: April 20, 2018 at 09:43 AM (#5656983)
The 1998 Yankees were 61-20 in the first half. Boston would match that if they go 45-18 from here on out. This is just to say that the 1998 Yankees had an insane first half.
And they had more losses after three games than the Sox have had through 18.
(I don't think that's remotely meaningful. I just find it even crazier that the Yankees went 61-20 in the first half after starting the season 0-3).
14. DavidFoss
Posted: April 20, 2018 at 10:14 AM (#5656994)
16-2. They could play .500 for the rest of the year and finish 88-74, probably earning a Wild Card berth.
That's usually the way I look at it. They've got 14 games above .500 in the bank.
For the franchise, the 1946 Red Sox started 15-3 on their way to 21-3 and eventually 41-9.
15. Darren
Posted: April 20, 2018 at 01:03 PM (#5657103)
Conclusion: no.
16. villageidiom
Posted: April 20, 2018 at 01:21 PM (#5657108)
Conclusion: no.
Snark aside, they're a real team, just as Boston was a real team in 2017. But despite that, in 2017 we knew Boston didn't compare to Houston. Houston was unreal. So far in 2018 Lanaheim is real, Boston is unreal, and the Mets are... undead?
That was one big dose of adversity for Ohtani. In the series he had 3x as many Ks hitting as he had pitching. Blisters suck.
17. Darren
Posted: April 20, 2018 at 01:35 PM (#5657115)
He was playing Indy ball and wasn’t likely to ever make it back to the show but Ryan Kalish officially retired according to Peter Gammons. He asked for one last at bat, singled and that was that. Man I had such high hopes for him.
Well it's over now. Fire Cora, trade Mookie, build for the future.
Joking aside, what in the #### was Febles doing last night? I don't think I've ever seen a runner out by that much. Early season but he's had a few really bad sends in my opinion.
For the second straight night....what the #### was Febles doing last night? I refer to the play where Benintendi couldn't see the right fielder and didn't tag up in the 7th inning. I realize that ideally the runner makes that read himself but it's not like Febles is loaded with responsibilities, he should be giving Benintendi some help there.
On the flip side this Mookie Betts cat is adequate and EdRod is looking strong.
21. Nasty Nate
Posted: April 26, 2018 at 09:08 AM (#5660818)
I may be mistaken, but I think that's all on Benintendi. The coach will presumably help him decide if it's deep enough, but I don't think they tell runners GO when catches are made.
22. jmurph
Posted: April 26, 2018 at 09:18 AM (#5660823)
I'm familiar with the general statheadish thinking on batting order not mattering that much, but it's still hard to shake the feeling that Mookie's power is being wasted at the top.
I may be mistaken, but I think that's all on Benintendi. The coach will presumably help him decide if it's deep enough, but I don't think they tell runners GO when catches are made.
Normally yes but evidently Benintendi was blocked by the 2B ump. I'd think the coach should be able to help there.
I'm familiar with the general statheadish thinking on batting order not mattering that much, but it's still hard to shake the feeling that Mookie's power is being wasted at the top.
I'd love it if we could have people on base for those homers but with Hanley, JD and Devers we should have some power bats inthe middle of the order and Mookie is that good mix of getting on base and speed as well. I don't mind that our best player is the one who is going to get the most plate appearances.
24. jmurph
Posted: April 26, 2018 at 09:45 AM (#5660857)
I don't mind that our best player is the one who is going to get the most plate appearances.
Yeah I probably lean that way, too, as long as 7-9 aren't total sinkholes.
25. Darren
Posted: April 26, 2018 at 10:37 AM (#5660921)
Perhaps it was my frustration with the offense's ineptitude, but I thought Vazquez should have been sent on Mookie's fly in the 5th. Was that crazy?
Mookie is good. He seems to thrive at the lead-off spot. I would be tempted, though, to bat him second and have Benintendi lead off, or put Pedroia there when he returns.
Perhaps it was my frustration with the offense's ineptitude, but I thought Vazquez should have been sent on Mookie's fly in the 5th. Was that crazy?
I think so. Watching the play I thought he was a sure out. Also there was still only one out and you and Benintendi-Hanley-JDM due. I liked our chances of getting Vazquez home there. If it was the second out of the inning I think you take more of a chance. Or if someone like Vazquez or JBJ is coming up, you don't have the same likelihood of scoring.
Mookie is good. He seems to thrive at the lead-off spot. I would be tempted, though, to bat him second and have Benintendi lead off, or put Pedroia there when he returns.
I think this is one of the larger blind spots we have here. By the numbers the ideal lineup doesn't produce that many more wins than the least ideal lineup, and conversely players DO care where they hit. Why mess with a good thing?
28. jmurph
Posted: April 26, 2018 at 11:56 AM (#5661047)
Is it Mookie's preference to lead-off? I wasn't aware of that. Either way I'm fine with whatever outcome.
29. Nasty Nate
Posted: April 26, 2018 at 12:00 PM (#5661055)
Mookie batted 2nd, 3rd, and 4th over different stretches in 2016 and 2017. I suspect part of his current spot is a R-L-R thing.
Is it Mookie's preference to lead-off? I wasn't aware of that. Either way I'm fine with whatever outcome.
I don't know if Betts has a preference for lead-off, but from the sounds of a few articles that came out prior to the season he did seem to want to be in one spot for the season, and Cora agreed with that. Put him #1 and leave him there.
Anyone else concerned Sale still seems to be struggling? Obviously he is still good - but he just does not look like the unbeatable monster he did at this point last year.
32. villageidiom
Posted: April 27, 2018 at 08:20 AM (#5661495)
Since 2016 Betts has led off the 1st with a HR 4 times in games the Red Sox eventually lost. One of those was a game he left early from due to injury. Another they scored 9 but lost by 4.
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Jose is an Absurd Sultan Posted: April 17, 2018 at 02:27 PM (#5655331)Tonight should be great. I'm going to try to stay up for it. I can't wait to see Ohtani and of course the Sox have been appointment viewing so far and in my opinion should continue to be. This is a good team.
Likewise. I mean, blisters happen, and it's hard for a pitcher to maintain command of his pitches when dealing with them. In retrospect it all makes sense. But I did not expect a one-sided home run derby to break out - and if I had, I wouldn't have expected the one side to be Boston.
Going into the series I took my usual stance for a west coast swing with evenly-matched teams: I expect Boston to take 1 of 3, and anything better than that is a bonus. Winning the first game puts them in a great position. I don't expect the next couple of games to be anything like last night - except maybe the Rodriguez game if the scores are reversed, because running up an absurd pitch count quickly is kinda his thing. But taking game 1 is awesome.
And they had more losses after three games than the Sox have had through 18.
(I don't think that's remotely meaningful. I just find it even crazier that the Yankees went 61-20 in the first half after starting the season 0-3).
That's usually the way I look at it. They've got 14 games above .500 in the bank.
For the franchise, the 1946 Red Sox started 15-3 on their way to 21-3 and eventually 41-9.
That was one big dose of adversity for Ohtani. In the series he had 3x as many Ks hitting as he had pitching. Blisters suck.
Joking aside, what in the #### was Febles doing last night? I don't think I've ever seen a runner out by that much. Early season but he's had a few really bad sends in my opinion.
On the flip side this Mookie Betts cat is adequate and EdRod is looking strong.
Normally yes but evidently Benintendi was blocked by the 2B ump. I'd think the coach should be able to help there.
I'd love it if we could have people on base for those homers but with Hanley, JD and Devers we should have some power bats inthe middle of the order and Mookie is that good mix of getting on base and speed as well. I don't mind that our best player is the one who is going to get the most plate appearances.
Yeah I probably lean that way, too, as long as 7-9 aren't total sinkholes.
Mookie is good. He seems to thrive at the lead-off spot. I would be tempted, though, to bat him second and have Benintendi lead off, or put Pedroia there when he returns.
I think so. Watching the play I thought he was a sure out. Also there was still only one out and you and Benintendi-Hanley-JDM due. I liked our chances of getting Vazquez home there. If it was the second out of the inning I think you take more of a chance. Or if someone like Vazquez or JBJ is coming up, you don't have the same likelihood of scoring.
I think this is one of the larger blind spots we have here. By the numbers the ideal lineup doesn't produce that many more wins than the least ideal lineup, and conversely players DO care where they hit. Why mess with a good thing?
I don't know if Betts has a preference for lead-off, but from the sounds of a few articles that came out prior to the season he did seem to want to be in one spot for the season, and Cora agreed with that. Put him #1 and leave him there.
I'm not worried about sequencing.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main