Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. John S
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 04:04 AM (#2496211)
the clitter... ok that's worse.
2. Lassus
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 04:08 AM (#2496224)
I actually think a lot of female baseball fans would prefer yours, John.
Because then their boyfriends would possibly be inspired to actually find it.
Or you could go for one incredibly easy task and just spike her drink at dinner. Although I don't know if the clitoris will reveal itself if she doesn't know she's aroused.
If you want to name a pitch after me, you call it "the slant" or something.
10. SumDum
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 10:07 AM (#2496364)
Methinks the fact they printed "The Slutter" in The Globe article, and it is the combo of those two pitches probably won't damage too many children.Besides if Sox fans were held to a strict code of decency and goodness I probably wouldn't see as many "Jeter Blows, Giambi Swallows, and Matsui *******"T-shirts when I go to Fenway.And we all know once the BBTF creator Saint Reverend Jim F. sees this horrid word it shall be censored for the good of America's children,and their children.
Huzzah <_<
11. pv nasby
Posted: August 23, 2007 at 11:57 AM (#2496370)
If you're gonna name one after Wok, wait a few years 'til he's lost a few inches off his fastball.
The article doesn't say anything about how this supposedly new pitch is thrown, and Papelbon had "at least one teammate rolling his eyes." If it's a cut fastball grip and a slider release, well, Andy Pettitte's been doing that his whole career. Papelbon has a refreshingly quirky sense of humor, not a patent on a new pitch.
14. Darren
Posted: August 24, 2007 at 01:44 AM (#2497585)
This thread has gone far worse than I thought it would.
This thread has gone far worse than I thought it would.
It could have been worse. Someone could have suggested "the Papelboner".
19. Dan Szymborski
Posted: August 24, 2007 at 02:51 AM (#2497827)
The article doesn't say anything about how this supposedly new pitch is thrown, and Papelbon had "at least one teammate rolling his eyes." If it's a cut fastball grip and a slider release, well, Andy Pettitte's been doing that his whole career. Papelbon has a refreshingly quirky sense of humor, not a patent on a new pitch.
Pap should call it a gyroball just to piss off Will Carroll.
I think "Pap smear" is by far the best alternative. If Jonathan Papelbon were a professional wrestler, his finishing move would absolutely be called the "Pap smear".
I think "Pap smear" is by far the best alternative. If Jonathan Papelbon were a professional wrestler, his finishing move would absolutely be called the "Pap smear".
Um, I thought anything with Papelbon and that medical procedure had been long banned by Therapy. I of course had tried this about a billion years ago, which led to the banning.
I think "Pap smear" is by far the best alternative. If Jonathan Papelbon were a professional wrestler, his finishing move would absolutely be called the "Pap smear".
No, it would be called the Papelbomb. You seriously overrate the creativity of wrestling writers.
26. Darren
Posted: August 25, 2007 at 04:28 AM (#2499168)
Yes, Wok is correct--the medical stuff is no good. Glider. Collider. Spider. Something like that.
27. Dan Szymborski
Posted: August 25, 2007 at 05:13 AM (#2499193)
No, it would be called the Papelbomb. You seriously overrate the creativity of wrestling writers.
Well, there's Rick Rude's "Rude Awakening" and Norman Smiley's "Norman Conquest."
28. tfbg9
Posted: August 25, 2007 at 03:28 PM (#2499307)
Who was the guy in the 70's who named his hybrid pitch "The Thang"? That could be brought back for Papelbon, and be suffciently G-rated.
29. Darren
Posted: August 25, 2007 at 03:58 PM (#2499323)
How about he calls it "a pitch that's not really all that new, apparently?" Or he just sticks with the pitches that have allowed him to K 68 in 45 IP this year?
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. John S Posted: August 23, 2007 at 04:04 AM (#2496211)Because then their boyfriends would possibly be inspired to actually find it.
Maybe.
OK, probably not.
Oh c'mon, nothing I ever say will be ever as indecent and sad as tonight's game.
how about the "taint," as in, t'ain't one and t'ain't th'other.
I'm OK with that.
man, i could do this all day. (that's what she said!)
ok, i'll stop now. (that's what she said!)
Huzzah <_<
Somebody get Brattain up in this joint.
It could have been worse. Someone could have suggested "the Papelboner".
Pap should call it a gyroball just to piss off Will Carroll.
Where did you think it would go?? The intro had me in stitches, and I am sure you didn't even mean to be funny.
Um, I thought anything with Papelbon and that medical procedure had been long banned by Therapy. I of course had tried this about a billion years ago, which led to the banning.
Well, there's Rick Rude's "Rude Awakening" and Norman Smiley's "Norman Conquest."
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main